For simplicity, let us set $V_n:=\{-1+1/2^n, \dotsc, 0 ,\dotsc, 1-1/2^n, 1\}$ with the periodic boundary conditions for each $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and think of the following vector space over this lattice:
\begin{equation} M(V_n):=\{f:V_n \to \mathbb{C} \mid f \text{ is the restriction of some Schwartz function on } \mathbb{R} \text{ to } V_n \}.\end{equation}
Then, clearly, $M(V_n)$ is a well-defined finite dimensional vector space over $\mathbb{C}$. Moreover, we can think of the direct limit of the collection $\{ M(V_n)\}_n$, which may be identified as the restriction of Schwartz space to the domain $(-1,1]$.
So, here are my questions. They are divided into two parts.
$M(V_n)$ is set-theoretically identical to the "set of all mappings from $V_n$ to $\mathbb{C}$". However, the "set of all mappings from $V_n$ to $\mathbb{C}$" cannot form a direct limit of the above kind since they can approximate singular functions such as the Heaviside function. What makes the crucial difference?
A finite symmetric difference operator $\partial_n$ on $M(V_n)$ defined by \begin{equation} \partial_n f(x):=2^{n+1}[f(x+1/2^n)-f(x-1/2^n)] \end{equation} is a linear operator. As $n \to \infty$, in what sense does this $\partial_n$ converge to the ordinary continuum differential operator?
These two questions seem quite subtle to me…. Could anyone please clarify?