hello, it is often said that a conformal mapping preserves the Laplace equetion in 2D. However, if this is true for the cartesian coordinates (x,y), where the laplacian is: $$ \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial y^2}=0 $$

is it true for the cylindrical coordinates (r,z) where:

$$ \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial r^2}+\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial z^2}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial r}=0? $$

More precisely, if you have a function $\phi(r,z)$ verifying the previous equation, is it also verified by $\psi(u,v)$ is $u+i v=f(z+ir)$ and f is analytic/holomorphic?

  • $\begingroup$ How about $$\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial r^2}+\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial z^2}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial r}=0 $$ $\endgroup$ Oct 13 '10 at 15:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Maybe the change of variables you want is $ue^{iv} = f(re^{iz})$ ... $\endgroup$ Oct 13 '10 at 15:27
  • $\begingroup$ To elaborate on Gerald's comment: the coordinate change you wrote down is not a conformal mapping [see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conformal_map ] in general. Also, this question has nothing to do with conformal field theory. $\endgroup$ Oct 13 '10 at 15:41
  • $\begingroup$ but that is suited when you want to apply you conformal mapping to the $(r,\theta)$ plane and not the $(r,z)$ plane, or? $\endgroup$
    – Mermoz
    Oct 13 '10 at 15:50
  • $\begingroup$ wait a second, what do you actually mean by the cylindrical coordinates in 2D? Are you actually interested in functions defined over 3 dimensional space but is constant along the azimuthal direction? $\endgroup$ Oct 13 '10 at 18:30

No. Take $\phi=r^2-2z^2$ and $f(z+ir)=(z+ir)^2$, thus $u=r^2-z^2$, $v=2rz$. Then $\phi(u,v)=r^4+z^4-10r^2z^2$ is not cylindrical-harmonic.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.