In the paper “Bubble Tree Convergence for Harmonic Maps” by Thomas H. Parker, after the picking the energy concentration points, he proceeded by expanding the map around each energy concentration point and then define the renormalized map by doing a translation of the centre of mass of the energy measure $e(f_n)$ in a small ball and then a dilation by a sequence $\lambda_n\to 0$. Similar argument is also done in Appendix B6 in “Width and Finite Extinction Time” by Colding and Minicozzi.
When I inspect the proof in these two paper, I see that the argument still goes through if we just do the dilation centred at each energy concentration point instead of considering centre of mass of the energy measure $e(f_n)$. Am I missing something or is there any specific reason we have to consider off-centre balls instead of the balls centred at the energy concentration points?