2
$\begingroup$

Recently I was looking at an article on arXiv (2009) "Bertini type theorems" by Jing Zhang (arXiv link). The email address of the author mentioned in the article seems no longer working. Can anyone let me know the email of the author? Since I have not seen any journal reference of the article, is it OK to use results from this article citing the arXiv version?

$\endgroup$
10
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ "OK to use results" --- well, arXiv is an unrefereed publication, so "OK" or "not OK" will depend on what use you have in mind. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2022 at 14:34
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ it is not refereed, so this is fully your responsibility; I presume you will want to check the proof yourself, and if you are satisfied it can be trusted, use it, otherwise do not. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2022 at 14:50
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ Does this answer your question? Should I not cite an arxiv.org paper which otherwise seems to be unpublished? See also How reliable is arXiv to use as a reference in a paper? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2022 at 18:01
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ In my opinion, if you want to use in an essential way a result published in a preprint (and not already accepted for publication) you should add a proof. If the proof is the same as the one in the preprint, you should also write something like "We borrow this argument from..." $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2022 at 18:56
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Why should one trust the stamp of approval by an anonymous referee for correctness more than the author who's track record you know? Many don't even think it's the referee's job to check correctness. $\endgroup$
    – Ville Salo
    Commented Mar 20, 2022 at 20:38

0

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.