2
$\begingroup$

Consider the following: $r_1,...,r_t$ are iid symmetric signs taking value $\pm1$, independent of $B\sim Binomial(p, q)$ with integer $p$ and $q=p^{-1.01}$.

Question: Consider $t$ as a non-decreasing function of $p$. For which such non-decreasing function of $p$ does there exist a constant $\lambda>0$ independent of $p$ such that the following holds: $$E[\exp(\lambda B \sum_{u=1}^t \frac{r_u}{\sqrt t})] \le 1.05,$$ for $p$ large enough.

Remark: Note that $\tilde Z = \sum_u\frac{r_u}{\sqrt t}$ has variance 1 and is very close to $N(0,1)$, for instance by Tusnady's inequality. If $\tilde Z$ were replaced by 1 inside the exponential, we could proceed as follows: using the exact formula for the MGF of the binomial, and using $(1+x/p)^p\le e^x$, $$ E[\exp(\lambda B)= (1-q + qe^\lambda)^p \le (1 + qe^\lambda)^p \le \exp(pq e^\lambda) \le \exp(p^{-0.01} e^{\lambda}), $$ so that for any constant $\lambda$ (say, $\lambda=1$), the RHS is bounded from above by 1.05 or any other constant strictly greater than 1. If $t$ is constant, not growing to $\infty$ simultaneously as $p$, then we can use this remark to answer the question.

Edit: Another remark: the previous argument shows $$E[\exp(\lambda \tilde Z B)= (1-q + qe^{\lambda\tilde Z})^p \le (1 + qe^{\lambda\tilde Z})^p \le \exp(pq e^{\lambda\tilde Z}) \le \exp(p^{-0.01} e^{\lambda\tilde Z}) $$ and since $\tilde Z\le \sqrt t$ always holds, $\sqrt t = \log(p^{0.009})\asymp \log p$ with $\lambda=0$ works. The harder question is with $t$ varying more rapidly than this.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Is "$t$ [...] a non-increasing function of $p$" or an "increasing function of $p$"? $\endgroup$ Mar 16, 2022 at 1:06
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. t is a non-decreasing function of $p$. For instance $t=p^c$ for some $c>0$, or $t=\log(p)^c$. Will fix the question. $\endgroup$
    – jlewk
    Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38
  • $\begingroup$ I added a remark that show that $\sqrt t \asymp \log p$ would work, for some small enough multiplicative constants. I am wondering about more rapidly growing functions of $p$. $\endgroup$
    – jlewk
    Mar 16, 2022 at 1:53

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\la}{\lambda}$The estimate of $t$ that you got cannot be improved. Indeed, let \begin{equation} S_t:=\sum_{u=1}^t \frac{r_u}{\sqrt t}. \end{equation} Suppose, as you did, that \begin{equation} E\exp(\la BS_t)\le1.05 \end{equation} for some real $\la>0$. Then \begin{equation} 1.05\ge\frac{\la^{2p}}{(2p)!}\,EB^{2p}\,ES_t^{2p} \gg \frac{\la^{2p}}{p^{2p}}\,EB^{2p}\,ES_t^{2p}, \end{equation} where $a\gg b$ means that $a\ge c^p b$ for some universal real constant $c>0$.

Using Corollaries 1 and 2 by Latała, we get \begin{equation} EB^{2p}\gg\Big(\frac p{\ln p}\Big)^{2p} \end{equation} and \begin{equation} ES_t^{2p}\gg \min[t^p,p^p]. \end{equation} Thus, \begin{equation} 1.05\gg \frac{\la^{2p}}{p^{2p}}\,\Big(\frac p{\ln p}\Big)^{2p}\,\min[t^p,p^p] =\la^{2p}\Big(\frac{\min[t,p]}{\ln^2 p}\Big)^p, \end{equation} which implies $\sqrt t=O(\ln p)$, as claimed.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Very insightful. Thanks, once again, for your time Iosif! $\endgroup$
    – jlewk
    Mar 17, 2022 at 0:38
  • $\begingroup$ @jlewk : Thank you for this appreciation of this answer. $\endgroup$ Mar 17, 2022 at 3:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.