This post is closely related to this one. (In fact I copied some of its content.)

Let $H$ be an infinite dimensional separable complex Hilbert space. All $C^{\star}$-subalgebras of $B(H)$ are assumed to be non-degenerate. The spectral projections of a self-adjoint element $T$ of $B(H)$ lie in the weakly closed algebra generated by $T$. In the early 1970s Pedersen proved that if a $C^{\star}$-subalgebra $A$ of $B(H)$ contains all of the spectral projections of each of its self-adjoint elements, then $A$ is weakly closed, i.e. $A=A''$. Now, concerning the consequences of this result, Pedersen says in his book:

"For any $C^\star$-subalgebra $A$ of $B(H)$ define $a(A)$ as the smallest $C^{\star}$-subalgebra of $B(H)$ containing all spectral projections of each self-adjoint element in $A$. [...] Note that [...] a transfinite (but countable) application of the operation $a$ will produce $A''$."

Question 1: What is the reasoning here?

I see that $\omega_1$ applications of the operation $a$ produce $A''$ and also that each element of $A''$ appears at the $\alpha$-th application for some $\alpha < \omega_1$ (This is due to the fact that the closure in the norm-topology is a sequential closure and hence, only countably many elements play a role.); but why is $a^{\alpha}(A)=A''$ for some $\alpha < \omega_1$?

Maybe there is something deeper behind:

Question 2: Is there an $\omega_1$-chain of unital subalgebras of $B(H)$?

Here $\omega_1$-chain means an $\omega_1$-index family $(A_{\alpha})_{\alpha< \omega_1}$ of subalgebras of $B(H)$ such that for all $\beta < \omega_1$ we have $$\overline{\cup_{\alpha< \beta}A_{\alpha}}^{\|.\|} \subsetneq A_{\beta}.$$


The answer to Question 2 is yes; such a chain can be found using only diagonal operators with respect to some fixed basis $(e_n)_{n\in{\mathbb N}}$ for $H$. As a starting point, you can find an $\omega_1$-sequence of subsets $S_\alpha\subset{\mathbb N}$ such that if $\alpha<\beta$, $S_\beta\setminus S_\alpha$ is finite and $S_\alpha\setminus S_\beta$ is infinite (that is, the sequence $(S_\alpha)$ is strictly decreasing "modulo finite sets"). This is easy to do because by diagonalizing, given a countable decreasing sequence of infinite subsets of ${\mathbb N}$, you can always find another infinite set which is strictly contained in all of them modulo finite sets. Now let $A_\alpha$ denote the algebra of diagonal operators such that the eigenvalues of the eigenvectors $e_n$ for $n\in S_\alpha$ form a convergent sequence. These are closed because a uniform limit of convergent sequences is convergent. These are nested because if $\alpha<\beta$, then all but finitely many elements of $S_\beta$ are contained in $S_\alpha$ so if the $S_\alpha$-eigenvalues converge, so do the $S_\beta$-eigenvalues.

Here's a more conceptual explanation of this construction. The algebra of diagonal operators is naturally isomorphic to the algebra $C_b({\mathbb N})$ of bounded continuous functions on $\mathbb N$, which is in turn naturally isomorphic to the algebra $C(\beta{\mathbb N})$ of all continuous functions on the Stone-Cech compactification of $\mathbb N$. Each set $S_\alpha\subset{\mathbb N}$ has a closure $\overline{S_\alpha}\subset\beta{\mathbb N}$, and the statement that the $S_\alpha$ are decreasing modulo finite sets says exactly that the sequence of closed sets $C_\alpha=\overline{S_\alpha}\setminus S_\alpha$ is actually decreasing. The subalgebra $A_\alpha$ is then exactly the set of continuous functions on $\beta{\mathbb N}$ which are constant on the set $C_\alpha$.

  • $\begingroup$ This is very nice! $\endgroup$ – Andreas Thom Oct 9 '10 at 18:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.