6
$\begingroup$

Assume $\kappa$ is $\lambda$-supercompact for some $\lambda$ but not fully supercompact. Are there any known restrictions (or provably non-restrictions) on the least $\delta$ such that $\kappa$ is not $\delta$-supercompact (e.g. $\text{cf}(\delta)\geq\kappa$ or $\text{lim}(\delta)$)?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

6
$\begingroup$

I'm not sure if this gets to the heart of the question, but here are some observations.

For a successor ordinal $\alpha$, let $\kappa_\alpha$ be the least $\kappa>\alpha$ which is $\kappa^{+\alpha}$-supercompact. Then $\kappa_\alpha$ is not $2^{\kappa_\alpha^{+\alpha}}$-supercompact. This is because an embedding $j : V \to M$ with critical point $\kappa_\alpha$ witnessing $2^{\kappa_\alpha^{+\alpha}}$-supercompactness would have that $M$ has a measure witnessing $\kappa_\alpha$ is $\kappa_\alpha^{+\alpha}$-supercompact. (Here, we need to invoke the theorem of Solovay that if $\lambda$ is regular and $\kappa$ is $\lambda$-supercompact, then $\lambda^{<\kappa}=\lambda$.) Since $j(\kappa_\alpha) > \kappa_\alpha$, there is $\kappa<\kappa_\alpha$ that is $\kappa^{+\alpha}$-supercompact, contradicting the definition of $\kappa_\alpha$.

On the other hand, if $\kappa$ is $\kappa^{+\alpha}$-supercompact, where $\alpha<\kappa$ is a limit ordinal, then $\kappa$ is $\kappa^{+\alpha+1}$-supercompact, since a $\lambda$-supercompactness measure for $\kappa$ witnesses $\lambda^{<\kappa}$-supercompactness. See Solovay-Reinhardt-Kanamori.

I suppose an interesting specialization of the question is, if $\kappa$ is $\kappa^{+}$-supercompact and $2^{\kappa^+} > \kappa^{++}$, is it $\kappa^{++}$-supercompact? We can preserve the $\kappa^+$-supercompactness and kill the $\kappa^{++}$-supercompactness by adding a nonreflecting stationary subset of $\kappa^{++}$, but I don't know how to do it without collapsing $2^{\kappa^+}$ to $\kappa^{++}$ simultaneously.

$\endgroup$
1
4
$\begingroup$

One can get fairly close bounds by observing that if $\kappa$ is $\lambda$-supercompact, then by using a supercompactness measure of least Mitchell rank, there is a $\lambda$-supercompactness embedding $j:V\to M$ for which $\kappa$ is not $\lambda$-supercompact in $M$. But $\kappa$ will be $\theta$-supercompact in $M$ whenever $2^{\theta^{<\kappa}}\leq\lambda^{<\kappa}$. So from the point of view from $M$, we have a good understanding of the exact point of failure of supercompactness of $\kappa$. Indeed, under GCH, these bounds are nearly tight.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.