Let $u\in\mathrm{GL}_n$ be a unipotent element, let $\mathcal{B}_u$ be the variety of Borel subgroups containing $u$, and let $d=\dim \mathcal{B}_u$. Then Springer theory tells us that $H^{2d}(\mathcal{B}_u,\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell})$ is an irreducible representation of $S_n$ in a natural way, and that all irreducible representations of $S_n$ come this way.

Now, combining with the branching rule of symmetric groups, viewing as representations of $S_{n-1}$ one has that \begin{equation} H^{2d}(\mathcal{B}_u,\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell})\cong\bigoplus_{u'}H^{2d'}(\mathcal{B}_{u'},\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell}), \end{equation} where $u'$ runs over some unipotent elements of $\mathrm{GL}_{n-1}$ whoese corresponding Young diagrams are obtained from that of $u$ by removing a corner box.

Question. Is there a purely geometric proof of the above displayed formula?


1 Answer 1


This is a nice question. I have never seen this before.

Let us write $$\mathcal B_u = \{ V_0 \subset V_1 \subset \cdots \subset V_{n-1} \subset V_n = \mathbb C^n : u V_i \subset V_i \}. $$ Let $ \lambda $ be the Jordan type of $ u $. Then we can partition $ B_u $ into locally closed subsets depending on the Jordan type of $ u \rvert_{V_{n-1}} $; such a Jordan type $ \mu$ must necessarily be obtained by removing one box from $ \lambda$. So we have $$ \mathcal B_u = \bigsqcup_\mu B_u^\mu \quad B_u^\mu = \{ V_\bullet : u\rvert_{V_{n-1}} \text{ has Jordan type $ \mu$ } \}.$$ Let $ G(n-1, n)_u $ denote the set of all $n-1$-dimensional $u$-invariant subspaces of $ \mathbb C^n $ and partition $ G(n-1,n)_u $ into locally closed subsets $ G(n-1,n)_u^\mu $ according to the Jordan type of the restriction of $ u $ to the subspace.

We have $ \mathcal B_u \rightarrow G(n-1,n)_u $ and $ \mathcal B^\mu_u $ is the preimage of $ G(n-1,n)^\mu_u$. Note that the fibre of $ \mathcal B_u \rightarrow G(n-1,n)_u $ is $ \mathcal B_{u\rvert_{ V_{n-1}}}$.

Now, here are two facts that I don't see right away, but which must be true:

  1. Each piece $ \mathcal B_u^\mu $ has the same dimension.
  2. $ G(n-1,n)^\mu_u $ is irreducible and simply-connected (or at least that the bundle $\mathcal B^\mu_u \rightarrow G(n-1,n)\mu_u$ is topologically trivial on components).

Edit: I think these facts should be contained in the classic paper by Spaltenstein https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138572587680008X

Assuming these facts, we get $$H(\mathcal B_u) = \bigoplus_\mu H(\mathcal B_u^\mu) = \bigoplus_\mu H(\mathcal B_{u(\mu)})$$ where again the direct sum ranges over all partitions made by deleting one box from $\lambda$ and where $ u(\mu)$ denotes a unipotent element of Jordan type $ \mu$, and $ H(X) $ denotes top (co)homology. This gives the desired decomposition.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.