2
$\begingroup$

I have been reading about Riemann Zeta function $\zeta(s)$ and have been thinking about it for some time. I did some calculations, and reached a conclusion where $\Re(\rho) \le \log_2(3) - 1$ as $\Im(\rho) \to \infty$ where $\rho$'s are the roots of Riemann Zeta function in the critical strip. Anyways, I know its not the place to discuss claimed proofs and similar stuff, but just to give a background of where I am coming from. So straight to the question.

Is there any similar result regarding upper bound ($< 1$) for the real part of the zeros zeta function as their imaginary parts tend to infinity?

Thanks

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ All results on zero-free regions have a strip with width tending to 0 as the imaginary part increases. $\endgroup$ – Charles Matthews Oct 5 '10 at 8:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ All known results on zero free regions are of the form $\zeta(\sigma+it) \neq 0$ when $\sigma > 1 - f(t)$, for some function $f$ with $\lim_{t \to \infty} f(t) =0$. A bound of the form you describe would be major progress. $\endgroup$ – David E Speyer Oct 5 '10 at 10:49
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ Honestly, you almostly certainly have an error. Your past questions have involved a number of elementary errors about analytic number theory and you are working on a problem which is notorious for drawing mathematicians into false proofs. In addition, if you are who I think you are, than 3 of your 6 papers on the arXiv have been withdrawn. (I am glad that you do withdraw errors!) Based on the little I know about you, you really need to find an advisor or mentor who can teach you how to do careful work in analytic number theory. $\endgroup$ – David E Speyer Oct 5 '10 at 11:00
  • $\begingroup$ If the proof is incorrect, what is the first equation in the paper that is incorrect? $\endgroup$ – user13672 Mar 15 '11 at 19:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ you may contact Prof.Bhaskar Bagchi of ISI,Bangalore.He was arguably the most interested person in India in RH.or you may contact me at bmat1013@isibang.ac.in. I am from ISI,Bangalore. $\endgroup$ – Koushik Feb 23 '13 at 3:08
9
$\begingroup$

There is no known non-trivial (less than 1) bound for real parts of Zeta zeros (I guess, it is even called "weak Riemann conjecture" to find such a bound). So, your result is very-very interesting, maybe the most interesting result in mathematics for many years.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I was searching for papers having zero free regions... and most of them gave results like $\Re(\rho) > 1 - \beta$. Are you sure there are no such results? (I'll wait before accepting your answer) $\endgroup$ – Roupam Ghosh Oct 5 '10 at 9:36
  • $\begingroup$ EDIT: by "no such results" I mean no results with $\Re(\rho) < c < 1$. Sorry for the typo $\endgroup$ – Roupam Ghosh Oct 5 '10 at 9:39
  • $\begingroup$ I think after Speyer's comments I am ready to accept you answer... Thanks Fedor and Speyer !!! $\endgroup$ – Roupam Ghosh Oct 5 '10 at 11:20
  • $\begingroup$ Here's my paper if anyone is actually interested :DDD docs.google.com/… $\endgroup$ – Roupam Ghosh Nov 11 '10 at 14:54
  • $\begingroup$ If I recall correctly, even proving things like a zero free sliver near Re = 1 would have major ramifications in making effective many of the cryptographic applications of RH (or really GRH). $\endgroup$ – lemiller Jul 27 '16 at 17:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.