6
$\begingroup$

Let $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ be a bounded domain with infinitely smooth boundary. Let $u\in C^2(\bar \Omega)$ be a solution of the Dirichlet problem for the non-linear equation \begin{eqnarray} F(x,u,\nabla u,\nabla^2 u)=0 \mbox{ in } \Omega,\\ u=\phi \mbox{ in } \partial \Omega. \end{eqnarray} Let the equation be elliptic with respect to $u$. Let us assume that $F,\phi$ are infinitely smooth.

QUESTION. Is it true that the assumption $u\in C^{2,\alpha}(\bar \Omega)$ for some $0<\alpha<1$ implies that $u\in C^\infty(\bar \Omega)$? A reference would be very helpful. Special cases are also of interest.

Remark. So far I was able to find in literature two special cases of this statement.

(1) In the above generality in follows that the solution $u\in C^\infty(\Omega)$ (i.e. smooth in the interior of $\Omega$, not including the boundary). This is Lemma 17.16 in the Gilbarg-Trudinger book.

(2) The question has positive answer (including the boundary) for $F$ of the form $$F(x,u,\nabla u,\nabla^2 u)=G(\nabla^2u)-f(x).$$ This is Prop. 5.1.10 in Qing Han's book.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

It is true and well-known (assuming $F$ is e.g. uniformly elliptic). The idea is sketched in ch. 9 of the book by Caffarelli-Cabre, but I am not sure of a precise reference at this level of generality. Interior smoothness follows from interior Schauder estimates (applied to difference quotients of $u$ and its derivatives, successively). To extend to the boundary, one uses boundary Schauder estimates. One can reduce to the case of zero boundary data and flat boundary (that is, $\Omega = B_1^+$ and $u = 0$ on $\{x_n = 0\}$) after subtracting $\phi$ and performing a diffeomorphism, which don't change the class of equations under consideration. The difference quotient method and boundary Schauder estimates show that $u_i$ are $C^{2,\alpha}$ up to the flat part of the boundary for $i < n$. By the uniform ellipticity of the equation, $u_{nn}$ can be written as a smooth function of $u_{ij}$ for $(i,\,j) \neq (n,\,n)$, $\nabla u$, $u$, and $x$. All of these quantities are $C^{1,\,\alpha}$ up to the flat part of the boundary, hence $u \in C^{3,\,\alpha}$ up to the boundary. Higher regularity follows after differentiating the equation (the coefficients of the differentiated equation are now $C^{1,\alpha}$) and applying a similar procedure. (One in fact only needs $u \in C^2\left(\overline{\Omega}\right)$; the first step uses instead the Calderon-Zygmund $W^{2,\,p}$ estimate for the equation solved by the difference quotients to get $C^{2,\alpha}$ regularity via embeddings (take $p > n$), and then proceeds as before).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.