5
$\begingroup$

$\require{AMScd}$I am currently thinking about (strict) henselisations but I don't know too much literature about the topic. So I am wondering if there is a natural way to restrict maps between strict henselisations to henselisations:

Let $A$, $B$ be local rings with an injective homomorphism $h:A\to B$. If I have a homomorphism $f:A^\text{sh} \to B^\text{sh}$, is there always a homomorphism $g:A^\text h \to B^\text h$ such that the following diagram commutes?

\begin{CD} A^\text{sh} @>f>> B^\text{sh}\\ @AAA @AAA\\ A^\text h @>>g> B^\text h \end{CD}

Equivalently, I am asking if you start with $x \in A^\text h \subset A^\text{sh}$, is $f(x) \in B^\text h$? It feels like this should be related to Galois theory, where Galois extensions fix the base field.

(Note: There might be requirements on $A$ and $B$ like being normal, or $B$ being a field. I'm also interested in answers with more assumptions than stated above.)

Clarifications: The underlying injective homomorphism $h: A \to B$ is not necessarily a local map but $f$ commutes with $h$.

\begin{CD} A^\text{sh} @>f>> B^\text{sh}\\ @AAA @AAA\\ A @>>h> B \end{CD}

The example I have in mind is the following: Pick a ring $R$ and a maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m} \in R$ and a map $\operatorname{Frac}(R) \to \operatorname{Frac}(R)^\text{sep}$ (i.e. a geometric point over the generic point of my curve $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$). Then $A := R_{\mathfrak{m}}$, $B:=\operatorname{Frac}(R)$, the map $h: A \to B$ is not local and $B \to B^\text{sh} = \operatorname{Frac}(R) ^\text{sep}$ is given by above chosen geometric point.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Is the homomorphism $f$ supposed to form a similar commutative diagram with the injective homomorphism $A \to B$? $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Nov 16, 2021 at 12:43
  • $\begingroup$ @WillSawin updated the post above. It does commute with the injective homomorphism $A \to B$ but that one is not local, which seems to be a problem. $\endgroup$ Nov 16, 2021 at 15:22

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

No. Let $A= k[x]_{(x)}$, the localization of the ring of polynomials in one variable at the maximal ideal $(x)$, and $B = k(x)$.

Assume (for simplicity) that the characteristic of $k$ is not $2$.

Then there exists $y \in A^h$ satisfying $y^2 = 1+x$, as that polynomial splits into distinct linear factors modulo $x$.

But there exists no $y \in B^h = B$ satisfying that equation, as writing $y = f/g$ we would have $f^2 = g^2(1+x)$ so $$2 \deg f = \deg f^2= \deg (g^2 (1+x)) = 2\deg g+1$$

So there can be no homomorphism $A^h \to B^h$ sending $x$ to $x$ (as it must to form a commutative diagram with the induced map on strict henselizations).

$\endgroup$
0
4
$\begingroup$

Edit: This answer is not suitable as the OP does not assume that the map $A\to B$ is local. See clarification by the OP and counter example by Sawin. Sorry.

This is true, without restrictions, and in a slightly more general formulation: star with a local homomorphism $f:A\to B$ and give yourself a morphism $\Omega\to \Omega'$, where $\Omega$ and $\Omega'$ are the residue fields of the strict henselisations of $A$ and $B$ respectively, such that $A\to A^{sh}\to \Omega\to\Omega'$ coincide with $A\to B\to B^{sh}\to \Omega'$. Then, there are unique $f^h:A^h\to B^h$ and $f^{sh}: A^{sh}\to B^{sh}$ making your diagram with $f^h$ (resp. $f^{sh}$) commute. Thus there is such a $g$ and it must be $f^h$.

Reference: [Raynaud, Anneaux locaux henseliens, VIII, 3, Proposition 4].

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ The question doesn't actually say, though it certainly seems to imply, that $f^\text{sh}$ comes from the map $A \to B$ (hence @WillSawin's comment). $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Nov 16, 2021 at 13:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ohh. I see. I overlooked that indeed. I will leave it as it is for now, in case the OP meant what I assumed. $\endgroup$
    – A.B.
    Nov 16, 2021 at 13:41
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. I added a clarification above. I think the issue I am experiencing is that the underlying map is not a local map, but all the results I encounter always assume it is. $\endgroup$ Nov 16, 2021 at 15:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.