Reverse martingale convergence theorem in Banach spaces In section 1.5 of a course given by Gilles Pisier, the author is claiming that in the excerpt below $\operatorname E[\varphi_i\mid\mathcal A_{-n}]\to\operatorname E[\varphi_i\mid\mathcal A_{-\infty}]$ in $L^2(\operatorname P)$ would follow from classical Hilbert space theory. What does he mean? How does he obtain this convergence?

Clearly, we know that if $\mathcal F\subseteq\mathcal A$ is a $\sigma$-algebra on $\Omega$, then $$\pi_{\mathcal F}X:=\operatorname E\left[X\mid\mathcal F\right]\;\;\;\text{for }X\in\mathcal L^1(\operatorname P)$$ is a linear contraction from $\mathcal L^p(\operatorname P)$ to $$\mathcal L^p(\mathcal F,\operatorname P):=\{X\in\mathcal L^p(\operatorname P):X\text{ is }\mathcal F\text{-measurable}\}.$$ If $p=2$, then $\pi_{\mathcal F}$ is an orthogonal projection from $\mathcal L^2(\operatorname P)$ to $\mathcal L^2(\mathcal F,\operatorname P)$ and hence a self-adjoint operator on $\mathcal L^2(\operatorname P)$. By the tower property of conditional expectation, we obtain $$\pi_{\mathcal G}=\pi_{\mathcal F}\pi_{\mathcal G}=\pi_{\mathcal G}\pi_{\mathcal F}\tag2$$ for all $\sigma$-algebras $\mathcal F,\mathcal G\subseteq\mathcal A$ with $\mathcal G\subseteq\mathcal F$.
While all that is clear to me, I don't get which argument he is referring to.
 A: Let $\{H_n\}_{n \ge 0}$ be a sequence of Hilbert spaces, with $H_{n+1} \subset H_n$ (Clarification: we assume that $H_{n+1}$ is a subspace of $H_n$) for all $n\ge 0$, and denote
$H_\infty=\cap_{n=1}^\infty H_n$.
Claim: If $P_n$ is the orthogonal projection from $H_0$ to $H_n$, and $P_\infty$ is the orthogonal projection from $H_0$ to $H_\infty$, then for all $x_0 \in H_0$, we have $P_n x\to P_\infty x$ in norm as $n \to \infty$.
Proof: For all $n \ge 1$, write $x_n:=P_n x_0$ and $y_n:=x_{n-1}-x_n$. Then $y_n$ is orthogonal to $H_n$ for all $n \ge 1$, so   the elements of the sequence  $\{y_n\}_{n \ge 1}$ are pairwise orthogonal. Thus Bessel's inequality gives $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \|y_n\|^2 \le \|x_0\|^2$, whence $\{x_n\}$ is a Cauchy sequence in $H_0$,
so it converges to some vector $z$. Since $z \in H_n$ for each $n$, we conclude that $z \in H_\infty$. Also, for all $h \in H_\infty$, we have $$0=\langle x_0-x_n,h\rangle \to \langle x_0-z,h\rangle $$
as $n \to \infty$, so $x_0-z$ is orthogonal to  $H_\infty$. Therefore $z=P_\infty x_0$.
