4
$\begingroup$

I have been doing research on the Niemeier lattices with root systems of type, $A_{k}^n$ and I am particularly interested in the finite groups permuting the constituent root systems. These groups seemed random at first, and they appeared to have a connection to certain projective linear groups over Galois fields with a prime number of elements. These root systems correspond to the divisors of $24$. I looked into the structures of the groups that permute the separate root systems and I was intrigued:

We will use the notation $K_{n}$ for the group that induces permutations on the corresponding Niemeier lattice $A_{k}^n$ (where $n·k = 24$).

Cases $K_{1}$ and $K_{2}$

$K_{1}$ can only be the trivial group as there is only $1$ vertex to act on and the only group that acts faithfully over any singleton set is trivial.

$K_{2}$ acts faithfully on $2$ vertices, corresponding to the exchange between the two root systems.

Case $K_{3}$

This group is isomorphic to the symmetric group of degree $3$ (order $3!$ or $6$). It also happens(?) to be isomorphic to the projective special linear group, $L_{2}(2)$

Case $K_{4}$

This group is isomorphic to the alternating group of degree $4$ (order $4!/2$ or $12$). This one is also isomorphic to another linear group, namely $L_{2}(3)$.

Case $K_{6}$

This group is isomorphic to the symmetric group of degree $5$ (order $5!$ or $120$), but the striking thing about this is that it’s acting primitively on $6$ vertices, not $5$ vertices. This group is related to the projective special linear group $L_{2}(5)$. It has one representation that acts primitively on the $6$ vertices of $PG_{1}(5)$, and another representation on $5$ vertices, (the alternating group, $A_{5}$), and both are contained within the symmetric group over $6$ vertices, $S_{6}$.

Case $K_{8}$

This group is isomorphic to $AGL_{3}(2)$ an affine group of rank $3$, over the Galois field of $2$ elements (order $8·7·6·4$ or $1344$). like all the other $K_{n}$ This group acts primitively on $8$ vertices. This one contains two distinct representations of the projective special linear group, $L_{2}(7)$ one of which is the action of the group $L_{2}(7)$ primitive over the $8$ vertices of $PG_{1}(7)$ the other is a group isomorphic to the first, another linear group $L_{3}(2)$. this one acts primitively over the $7$ vertices of $PG_{2}(2)$

Case $K_{12}$

This group is isomorphic to one of the sporadic groups, namely $M_{12}$ the Mathieu group of degree $12$ (order $8·9·10·11·12$ or $95040$). this group contains two separate representations of the linear group $L_{2}(11)$, but unlike the previous two cases, only one of these groups is maximal within $K_{12}$ (namely the group $L_{2}(11)$ and its primitive action over the $12$ vertices of $PG_{1}(11)$). The other one is more subtle, as it’s not maximal in $M_{12}$, however it is maximal in another sporadic group $M_{11}$ (the stabiliser of either a point or a total within $M_{12}$). This representation of $L_{2}(11)$ acts primitively over $11$ vertices.

Case $K_{24}$

This group is the most notable one, as it contains all the groups mentioned previously. It is isomorphic to a very interesting sporadic group called $M_{24}$ the Mathieu group of degree $24$ (order $3·16·20·21·22·23·24$ or $244823040$). It contains a linear subgroup of type $L_{2}(23)$, but unlike the previous cases there is only a single instance of this group, and there is no additional representation over $n - 1$ vertices. There is a lot of structure happening here, and frankly I haven’t enough space for that.

A recapitulation of the groups $K_{n}$

Orders:

$|K_{1}| = 1 $

$|K_{2}| = 2 $

$|K_{3}| = 6 $

$|K_{4}| = 12 $

$|K_{6}| = 120 $

$|K_{8}| = 1344 $

$|K_{12}| = 95040 $

$|K_{24}| = 244823040 $

Other facts:

$K_{3} \cong S_{3} \cong L_{2}(2) $

$K_{4} \cong A_{4} \cong L_{2}(3) $

$K_{6} \cong S_{5} \supset L_{2}(5) \cong A_{5} $

$K_{8} \cong AGL_{3}(2) \supset (L_{2}(7) \cong L_{3}(2)) $

$K_{12} \cong M_{12} \supset M_{11} \supset L_{2}(11) $

$K_{12} \cong M_{12} \supset L_{2}(11) $

$K_{24} \cong M_{24} \supset L_{2}(23) $

$M_{24} \supset \text{ (all previous ones)} $

I have only two questions:

  1. Why do these $K_{n}$ have their respective structures instead of just $S_{n}$? What do they have in common?
  2. What sort of structure must these $K_{n}$ maintain under their respective group actions?

I will also remind us of what we defined the groups $K_{n}$ to be: the group of permutations of the separate root systems of the Niemeier lattices of type $A_{k}^n$ (with $n·k = 24$)

Edit: I forgot to mention: As of writing this, I have no proper experience in Niemeier lattices. I’d prefer it if the explanation were limited to group theory and a basic understanding of lattice theory.

Update: I had just found something interesting. These $8$ groups seem closely related to certain Umbral Groups (particularly, the ones of lambdacy $2$, $3$, $4$, $5$, $7$, $9$, $13$, and $25$) [7th November 2021, 21:05]

Proof of the Umbral Moonshine Conjecture: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.01472.pdf

Umbral Moonshine and the Neiemeir Lattices: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1307.5793.pdf

$\endgroup$
5
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The symbol $\subset$ means 'subset' or 'subgroup'. But $M_{12}$ is a supergroup of $M_{11}$. So most (or all?) symbols $\subset$ should be replaced by $\supset$. $\endgroup$ Oct 18 at 21:18
  • $\begingroup$ I just noticed that the statement about $K_{6}$ isn’t entirely true. I was actually thinking about $S_{6}$ and I confused it with $K_{6}$ in my mind. $\endgroup$ Oct 19 at 11:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The group $M_{24}$ preserves the binary Golay code. For background, see [1]. A natural structure preserved by the automorphism group of a Niemeier lattice is the glue code as described in [1], Chapter 16. * [1] Conway, Sloane, Sphere packings, Lattices and Groups. $\endgroup$ Oct 20 at 9:47
  • $\begingroup$ Luckily for me, I happen to own that book, Martin. but, I haven’t been able to find an explanation for this phenomenon involving certain "glue codes". $\endgroup$ Oct 21 at 10:07
  • $\begingroup$ To clarify what I meant, by "phenomenon". I was talking about how the automorphism groups of these "glue codes" were identified, i.e. the reason for their established structures. The case with $D_{k}^n$ for $k \geq 4$ and $k · n = 24$ is a little simpler than this case, as the automorphism group of the former has order $n!$ $\endgroup$ Oct 21 at 19:06
2
$\begingroup$

The information required for answering this question is contained in [1]. There it is scattered over many chapters; so I will give a summary here.

Let $N$ be a Niemeier lattice, $R$ be the sublattice of $N$ generated by its roots and and $R^*$ be the dual lattice of $R$. Then $G = R^*/R$ is an Abelian group, the glue group. The elements of $G$ are called the glue vectors of $G$. Since $N$ is unimodular, the subgroup $H = N/R$ of $G$ has order $|G|^{1/2}$ and also index $|G|^{1/2}$ in $G$. See [1], Chapter 4.3 for an introduction to gluing theory.

If $R = R_1 \oplus \ldots \oplus R_n$ then $G$ has structure $G= G_1 \oplus \ldots \oplus G_n$ with $G_i = R_i^* / R_i$.

For each glue vector $v \in G$ let $l(v)$ be the norm of its shortest representative in $R^*$. Then we have a decomposition $v = v_1 + \ldots + v_n$ with $v_i \in G_i$; and we have $l(v) = l(v_1) + \ldots l(v_n)$, where $l(v_i)$ is the norm of the shortest representative of $v_i$ in $R_i^*$.

The glue groups of the root lattices and their length functions $l$ are known; for the case $A_n$ see [1], Chapter 4.6. The glue group of $A_n$ is cyclic of order $n+1$. If $g$ is a generator of that group then we have $l(k\cdot g) = \frac{k \cdot (n+1-k)}{n+1}$ for $0 \leq k \leq n$.

Since $N$ is an even lattice, $l(v)$ must be an even integer for all $v \in H$. All roots of $N$ lie in $G$; so $l(v) > 2$ must hold for all nonzero glue vectors $v\in H$.

The conditions listed above impose some rather severe restrictions on the subgroup $H$ of $G$, which are discussed in [1], Chapter 18.4. Obviously, a permutation of the root lattices preserving a Niemeier lattice must also preserve the subgroup $H$ and the norm function $l$ on $H$.

Thus the subgroup $H$ of $G = R^* / R$ and the norm function $l$ on $H$ is the structure preserved by the permutation groups $K_n$ of the Niemeier lattices $A_k^{24/k}$.

An answer to the question why a certain group $K_n$ has a certain structure is to some extent opinion based. For the large cases $K_{24/(n-1)}, n = 2,3,$ the Abelian group $G$ happens to be a vector space over $\mbox{GF}_n$, and the norm function turns out to be proportional to the Hamming weight of a vector. So we have to look for linear codes over $\mbox{GF}_n^k$, where $(n-1)\cdot k = 24$, with Hamming distance at least 8 in case $n=2$ and 6 in case $n=3$. Such codes are known as Golay codes and also discussed in [1].

For the small cases $K_k, k \leq 8$ we have to look for permutation groups on $k$ letters. Here the linear groups $\mbox{SL}_2(k-1)$ have such a permutation representation.

[1] Conway, Sloane, Sphere packings, Lattices and Groups.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Do these glue codes have anything to do with Umbral Moonshine theory? $\endgroup$ Nov 8 at 2:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.