1
$\begingroup$

Consider a separable Hilbert space $\mathcal H$ and the bounded linear operators $B(\mathcal H)$. Consider a function $T: [0, \infty) \to B(\mathcal H)$, under what assumptions on $T(t)$ is it true that $$\big(\int_0^c T(t) \, dt \big) (x) = \int_0^c T(t)x \, dt \ , \ \ \ \forall x \in \mathcal H , c \in (0, \infty)$$
for the Bochner integral? I am aware of a similar question for semigroups of BLO on Banach spaces,The Bochner integral about a semigroup of bounded linear operators on a Banach space, but I am interested in general operator-valued functions.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Either the family of operators should be renamed, or the limit on the integral... :) But/and, for example, continuity $t\to T(t)$ is sufficient, in any of operator norm, strong, or weak topologies on bounded operators, for example. Is this the sort of condition that would be adequate for you? $\endgroup$ Sep 26, 2021 at 17:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Can you provide some references, or is this easy to see? Yes, this is the sort of condition that I'm after! Is it also true if $T(t)$ is piecewise norm-continuous, i.e.\ it has a countable number of discontinuities? $\endgroup$
    – Arbiter
    Sep 26, 2021 at 17:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The result you need is Theorem 6 on p. 47 of the standard "Vector Measures" by Diestel and Uhl (required reading for anybody working with the Bochner integral). This shows, roughly speaking, that a continuous (even closed) linear operator applied to a Bochner integral can be pulled under the integral sign just as one would expect. There is a slight twist in that you must interpret an element $x$ of $E$ as a continuous linear operator from $L(E,F)$ into $F$ (via evaluation). $\endgroup$
    – memorial
    Sep 26, 2021 at 20:48

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

I understand you assume that $T:[0,c]\to\mathcal{B(H)}$ is Bochner integrable in order to write $\int_0^c T(t)dt$ as Bochner integral. Then for any $x\in\mathcal H$ the map $ [0,c]\ni t\mapsto \mathcal H$ is also Bochner integrable and the identity you wrote holds. More generally: for a measure situation $(X,\mathcal S,\mu)$, a couple of B-spaces $\mathbb E$ and $\mathbb F$, a bounded linear operator $L:\mathbb E\to \mathbb F$, and a Bochner integrable map $f:X\to \mathbb E$, the composition $L\circ f:X\to \mathbb F$ is Bochner integrable and $\int_X L f(u) d\mu(u)=L\int_X f(u))d\mu(u)$ (in your case $L$ is the evaluation map $\mathcal{B(H)}\ni A\mapsto Ax\in\mathcal H$).

(The proof is immediate if $f:=v\chi_S$ with $v\in\mathbb E$ and $S\in\mathcal S$; by linearity it generalizes immediately to integrable simple functions $f:X\to \mathbb E$; it further generalizes immediately to $f\in \mathcal L^1(\mu,\mathbb E)$, by the very definition of Bochner integrable function and integral).

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

In addition to @PietroMajer's good answer, I'd want to make a point about "vector-valued integrals" (and related), that the Bochner integral gives a construction (of something we want, with certain obvious/natural properties), but/and we have to prove that this construction succeeds. Oppositely, we can go the Gelfand-Pettis route, and "define" a "weak" integral on $V$-valued functions $f$ to be a linear functions $I$ such that, for all $\lambda$ in the dual space to $V$, $\lambda(I(f))=\int \lambda(f)$. After all, moving a linear operator inside the integral is the main thing we want to do.

Many sources do treat this issue (Rudin's "Functional Analysis", up to a point, Bourbaki's "Integration theory", and various notes of mine, for example).

A very convenient sufficient criterion is that the value-space $V$ is quasi-complete, locally convex, and that the $V$-valued function is continuous and compactly supported. The arguments to prove that various non-Frechet TVS's are quasi-complete (such as spaces of distributions, or continuous operators with strong or weak topologies) are not as well known, but do hold, for robust reasons.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.