0
$\begingroup$

I have the following questions: Let $Z$ be a continuous one-dimensional Markov process on some probability space $(\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P})$ and $\mathcal{F}_t = \sigma(Z_s,s \leq t)$. Then show that for all $T > 0$:

for all $t \leq T$ there exists a function $F(t,T,\cdot)$ such that

$$E[e^{-\int_{t}^T R(Z_s) ds} | \mathcal{F}_t] = F(t,T,Z_t),$$

where $R$ is some function. If $Z$ is time-homogeneous then for all $t\leq T$ there exists a function $G$ such that $$F(t,T,z) = G(T-t,z).$$

So for question (1) I intuitively know that $E[e^{-\int_{t}^T R(Z_s) ds} | \mathcal{F}_t] = E[e^{-\int_{t}^T R(Z_s) ds} | Z_t] $ but how do I prove it? For question (2) I was thinking about expressing it in terms of $Q_{T-t}f(Z_t)$ where $(Q_{t})_{t \geq 0}$ is the transition semi-group, but since there is an integral expression I have no clue how to do this.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1
$\begingroup$

Regarding question (1): There are many ways to phrase the Markov property. One of the more convenient ones is as follows: if $\Phi$ is a non-negative function measurable with respect to $\mathcal F_{t,\infty} := \sigma\{X_s : s \ge t\}$, then $$ E[\Phi | \mathcal F_t] = E[\Phi | X_t] \text{ a.s.} $$ Furthermore, by the Doob–Dynkin lemma, the right-hand side is equal a.s. to a Borel function of $X_t$.

Clearly, in our case $\Phi_{t,T} = \exp(-\int_t^T R(Z_s) ds)$ is $\mathcal F_{t,\infty}$-measurable (thanks to continuity of $Z_s$; I assume that $R$ is nice enough — say: locally bounded from below), so clearly $$ E[\Phi_{t,T} | \mathcal F_t] = F_{t,T}(X_t) \text{ a.s.} $$ for a Borel function $F_{t,T}$.

The true question is whether we can choose $F_{t,T}$ in such a way that $(t,T,x) \mapsto F_{t,T}(x)$ is jointly measurable. I expect that under reasonable assumptions (say: the function $R$ is bounded from below), this is standard, but tiresome; however, I did not attempt to write a detailed proof.

(What is easy is that $\Phi_{t,T}$ is uniformly bounded and almost surely continuous with respect to $t, T$, and hence, by the dominated convergence theorem, $(t,T) \mapsto \Phi_{t,T}$ is a continuous map into $L^1(\Omega, P)$; in particular, $(t,T) \mapsto F_{t,T}(X_t)$ is a continuous map into $L^1(\Omega, P)$.)

The answer to question (2) really depends on your favourite definition of a time-homogeneous Markov process. If we are allowed to use the shift operators $\theta_t$ and expectation $E^x$ for the process started at $x$, then things are pretty clear: we have $\Phi_{t,T} = \Phi_{0,T-t} \circ \theta_t$, and hence $$ E[\Phi_{t,T} | \mathcal F_t] = E[\Phi_{0,T-t} \circ \theta_t | \mathcal F_t] = G_{T-t}(X_t) , $$ where $$ G_s(x) = E^x \Phi_{0,s} $$ is a Borel function. Noteworthy, here joint measurability of $(s,x) \mapsto G_s(x)$ presents no difficulties: $s \mapsto \Phi_{0,s}$ is a continuous map into $L^1(\Omega, P)$, and so $s \mapsto G_s(x)$ is continuous for every $x$.

I should also add that there is no simple expression for the conditional expectation of the Feynman–Kac functional $\Phi_{t,T}$ in terms of the transition semigroup of the process.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
10
  • $\begingroup$ thank you very much for your quick answer. Regarding (1), I have never seen this definition to be honest, the definition I know is actually the other way around: $$E[f(X_t) | \mathcal{F}_s] = E[f(X_t) | Z_s].$$ where $\mathcal{F}_t = \sigma(X_s ; s \leq t)$ $\endgroup$
    – Oli Bernet
    Sep 25, 2021 at 11:05
  • $\begingroup$ For (2), your notation for the function $\Phi$ got me thinking about the simple Markov property, and I came up with the following solution: Let $\mathbb{D}(\mathbb{R})$ be set of cadlag functions $t \mapsto f(t)$ Define $\Phi_{T-t}:\mathbb{D}(\mathbb{R}) \mapsto [0,\infty)$ by $\Phi_{T-t}(f) = e^{-\int_0^{T-t} f(s) ds}.$ by simple Markov property $E_{Z_t}[\Phi_{T-t}] = E[\phi((R(Z_{t+s}))_{s \geq 0}) | \mathcal{F}_t] = E[e^{-\int_0^{T-t} R(Z_{s+t}) ds} | \mathcal{F}_t] = E[e^{-\int_t^{T} R(Z_s) ds} | \mathcal{F}_t],$ thus define $G(T-t,Z_t) := E_{Z_t}[\Phi_{T-t}].$ $\endgroup$
    – Oli Bernet
    Sep 25, 2021 at 11:06
  • $\begingroup$ So my solution 2 is equivalent to yours using the shift operator $\endgroup$
    – Oli Bernet
    Sep 25, 2021 at 11:09
  • $\begingroup$ Regarding your first comment: this is equivalent. Indeed, the $\sigma$-algebra generated by $f(X_t)$, where $t \geqslant s$ and $f$ is a Borel function, is precisely the $\sigma$-algebra $\mathcal F_{s,\infty}$ in my answer. $\endgroup$
    – Mateusz Kwaśnicki
    Sep 25, 2021 at 12:34
  • $\begingroup$ In your second comment, you either implicitly use the shift operators (as suggested by the notation $\phi((R(Z_{t+s}))_{s\geqslant 0})$; I guess you meant $\Phi_{T-t}$ rather than $\phi$) or you work with the canonical realisation of the process with $\Omega$ being simply $\mathbb D(\mathbb R)$ (as suggested by $E_{Z_t}[\Phi_{T-t}]$. Both are fine, but mixing them is somewhat inconsistent. $\endgroup$
    – Mateusz Kwaśnicki
    Sep 25, 2021 at 12:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.