In the mod $p$ local Langlands correspondence for $\mathrm{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{Q}_{p})$, the irreducible supercuspidal representation $\left(\mathrm{ind}^{\mathrm{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{Q}_{p})}_{\mathrm{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{Z}_{p})\mathbb{Q}_{p}^{\times}}\mathrm{Sym}^{r}\overline{\mathbb{F}}_{p}^{2}\right)/T$ of $\mathrm{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{Q}_{p})$ is mapped to the irreducible Galois representation $\mathrm{ind}(\omega_{2}^{r+1})$ for $r\in\lbrace 0,\ldots,p-1\rbrace$. See Definition 1.1 in

https://www.imo.universite-paris-saclay.fr/~breuil/PUBLICATIONS/GL2%28Qp%29II.pdf (with $\eta=1$).

However, I notice that this is not compatible with the local class field theory: on $\mathbb{Z}_{p}^{\times}$, the central character of the supercuspidal representation is the $r$-th power map after going modulo $p$, while the determinant character of the Galois representation is the $(r+1)$-th power map.

So is it defined this way to satisfy some other compatibilities (for example, reduction modulo $p$ of the $p$-adic local Langlands for $\mathrm{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{Q}_{p})$)?


1 Answer 1


You seem to be expecting that mod $p$ local Langlands should satisfy the same compatibilities as "conventional" local Langlands (for smooth representations of $GL_2(\mathbf{Q}_p)$ and $WD(\mathbf{Q}_p)$ with coefficients in $\mathbf{C}$).

However, before you can even talk about reduction mod $p$, you need to check that the coefficients can be descended from $\mathbf{C}$ to a number field. I.e., if $\pi$ is a smooth irred rep of $GL_n(\mathbf{Q}_p)$ on an $L$-vector space, where $L$ is some subfield of $\mathbf{C}$, then is its Langlands parameter $\phi_{\pi}$ an $L$-valued Weil-Deligne rep? The answer, annoyingly, is "no": if $n$ is even, you have to add $\sqrt{p}$ to $L$ in order to get this to work. So it's common to re-normalise by twisting the correspondence for $GL_n$ by $|\det|^{(n-1)/2}$; this makes it compatible with coefficient fields, and also works better for local-global compatibility.

It's this same shift which you are seeing in the mod $p$ theory, and here it's completely impossible to get rid of, even if you extend the coefficient fields as much as you like: the character $|\cdot|^{1/2}$ of $\mathbf{Q}_p^\times$ is not $p$-adically unitary, so there is no way you can reduce it mod $p$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for this answer. $\endgroup$ Sep 19, 2021 at 12:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.