3
$\begingroup$

A $3$-manifold $M$ is called $P^2$-irreducible if it is irreducible and there is no $2$-sided $P^2$ contained in $M$.

Can we show $M$ is $P^2$-irreducible iff $\pi_2(M)=0$?

Notice that one direction follows directly from the Sphere theorem.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is polite to ask your exact question. So, if you know how to do one direction, please just ask the other. $\endgroup$
    – Sam Nead
    Commented Sep 3, 2021 at 12:21

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

Yes.

One direction is immediate by the Sphere theorem (projective plane theorem) as pointed out by the OP.

Assume $M$ satisfies $\pi_2(M)=0$. Note that this condition with the Poincare conjecture means any sphere in $M$ bounds a $3$-ball (see here). Therefore, we conclude that $M$ is irreducible.

Suppose $M$ contains a $2$-sided $P^2$. One considers the orientation double cover $M'\overset{p}{\longrightarrow} M$ and assume $p^{-1}(P^2)=S$ which is a sphere (not $P^2$s by our assumption). As above, $S$ bounds a $3$-ball $B$ and we consider $B\overset{p}{\longrightarrow} p(B)$. It is not hard to show this is a double covering map. However, the involution on $B$ contains a fixed point by Brouwer fixed-point theorem. We obtain a contradiction.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ A few comments. 1) You need to say which double cover $p$ is. 2) It seems to me that this wants to be a proof by contrapositive, not by contradiction. 3) The phrase "not hard to show" should be avoided. Either say it is an exercise or give the necessary sentence of explanation. $\endgroup$
    – Sam Nead
    Commented Sep 4, 2021 at 15:32
1
$\begingroup$

Suppose that $P \subset M$ is a two-sided real projective plane. Let $M'$ be the orientation double cover of $M$. Let $S$ be the two-sphere in $M'$ that double covers $P$.

Exercise A: $P$ is non-separating in $M$ if and only if $S$ is non-separating in $M'$.

Exercise B: If $S$ separates $M'$, then neither component of $M' - S$ is a three-ball.

We deduce, in both the separating and non-separating cases, that $\pi_2(M')$ is non-trivial; thus $\pi_2(M)$ is non-trivial.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ A comment: The phrase "Exercise A/B etc." should be avoided. Either say it is not hard to say or give the necessary sentence of explanation. $\endgroup$
    – Adterram
    Commented Sep 5, 2021 at 13:28
  • $\begingroup$ @Adterram: "Exercise" says clearly to the reader "there is work to do here". "It is not hard to show" has a similar feel but, more often than not, gives an incorrect sense of the difficulty of the task. Gowers gives evidence, here: gowers.wordpress.com/2008/09/17/princeton-companion-errata $\endgroup$
    – Sam Nead
    Commented Sep 5, 2021 at 19:23

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .