enter image description here

We can see from the above picture the transition density of reflecting Browninan motion is given by (19). As we know, the first part ($2p(t,x,y)$) is the transition density of a Brownian motion (from $x$ to set $y$) and the second part($2p(t,-x,y)$) also is the transition density of a Brownian motion (from $-x$ to set $y$).

  1. My first question is the figure. $p_t(x,E)$ should equal $p(t,x,y)$ + $p(t,-x,y)$, but why in the figure the area of the shadow denoting $p_t(x,E)$ looks larger than the sum of those denoting $p(t,x,y)$ and $p(t,-x,y)$?
  2. Why does the transition density (19) represent the rerflected Brownian motion at barrier 0? The connection among them is not so obvious. In particular, how to explain these two parts? why the sum of these two transition densities represent a modulus Brownian motion, where can I see it?

1 Answer 1

  1. The solid line in the figure that represents $p(t;-x,y)+p(t;x,y)$ looks qualitatively OK but quantitatively wrong.

  2. Let $y=|x_0|$ and $E\subset[0,\infty)\,.$ Then $p_t(y;E)=P(|x_t|\in E)=P(x_t\in E)+P(-x_t\in E)=\int_Ep(t;x,y)\,dx+\int_Ep(t;-x,y)\,dx\,.$

  • $\begingroup$ In fact, your answer for the second question is not clear. Why you see (19), you can conncet with $|B_t|$? How two explain (19)? $\endgroup$
    – Ailiy Evan
    Aug 16, 2021 at 13:57
  • $\begingroup$ Because $p(t;x,y)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi t}}\exp[-\frac{(y-x)^2}{2t}]$ the equation I wrote is (19). Secondly, the unreflected BM is $x_t$ and the reflected one is $|x_t|\,.$ $\endgroup$
    – Kurt G.
    Aug 16, 2021 at 14:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.