The 1991 paper of Lewis, “Is there a convenient category of spectra?” proved that it is impossible to have a point-set model for spectra satisfying the following criteria:

  1. There is a symmetric monoidal smash product $\wedge$;
  2. We have an adjunction $\Sigma^\infty\dashv\Omega^\infty$;
  3. The sphere spectrum $\mathbb{S}$ is the unit for $\wedge$;
  4. There is either a natural transformation $$(\Omega^\infty E)\wedge(\Omega^\infty F)\Rightarrow\Omega^\infty(E\wedge F)$$ or a natural transformation $$\Sigma^\infty(E\wedge F)\Rightarrow(\Sigma^\infty E)\wedge(\Sigma^\infty F),$$ either of which is then required to satisfies the usual coherence conditions for monoidal functors.
  5. There is a natural weak equivalence $\Omega^\infty\Sigma^\infty X\dashrightarrow\lim_{n\in\mathbb{N}}(\Omega^n\Sigma^nX)$.

Since Lewis's paper, a number of model categories of spectra have appeared, each of which satisfies some, but not all, of the requirements (1)–(5). For instance, the category of $\mathbb{S}$-modules of Elmendorf–Kriz–Mandell–May satisfy (1)–(4), but not (5).

A modern point of view regarding spectra is that they are the $\infty$-categorical analogue of abelian groups in the sense that $\mathsf{Grp}_{\mathbb{E}_{\infty}}(\mathcal{S})\cong\mathsf{Sp}_{\geq0}$. Similarly, the $\infty$-categorical analogue of commutative monoids are $\mathbb{E}_{\infty}$-spaces, the $\mathbb{E}_{\infty}$-monoids in the symmetric monoidal $\infty$-category of spaces $\mathcal{S}$.

Is there an analogue of Lewis's argument for $\mathbb{E}_{\infty}$, giving a similar list of nice properties we may expect of a point-set model of $\mathbb{E}_{\infty}$-spaces, but such that there is no such point-set model satisfying all of them?

Moreover, in this case, how do the current point-set models for $\mathbb{E}_{\infty}$-spaces (such as $*$-modules, $\Gamma$-spaces, $\mathcal{I}$-spaces) fare in such a list?


1 Answer 1


For $E_\infty$ spaces, homotopy-theoretically there is a functor $L: \mathcal{S} \to E_\infty \mathcal{S}$ with a right adjoint $R$. The only property on this list that really needs replacing on this list is property (5): the unit $$ X \to RL(X) $$ should be homotopy equivalent to the natural inclusion $$ X \to Free_{E_\infty}(X) \simeq \coprod_{k \geq 0} E \Sigma_k \times_{\Sigma_k} (X^k) $$ into the free $E_\infty$-space on $X$. (Yes, yes, possibly a version with basepoints, I know)

I believe that all three of the models of $E_\infty$ spaces that you list (commutative monoids in $*$-modules, $\Gamma$-spaces, commutative $\mathcal{I}$-space monoids) satisfy properties (1)-(4) and fail the analogue of property (5), each due to an issue about whether an input to an adjunction is cofibrant/fibrant. For $\Gamma$-spaces, for example, the map $X \to RL(X)$ only adds a disjoint basepoint. Perhaps someone with more experience with the other models would be able to fill in those stories better.

  • $\begingroup$ This is perfect, thank you! $\endgroup$
    – Emily
    Commented Aug 9, 2021 at 21:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.