I want to prove the following: (Here, $W^{2,2}$ is a Sobolev space as defined in Evans, chapter 5; $S$ is a Schwartz space; and if $A$ is a distribution and $a$ a function, then $\langle A, a\rangle$ means $A(a)$).

Theorem. Let $\newcommand{\C}{\mathbb C}\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb R}C\in]0,\infty[$. For every $f\in L^2 (\mathbb R;\C)$ there exists a $g\in (L^2 \cap W^{2,2}_{\text{loc}})(\R;\C)$ such that (in the weak sense) \begin{equation} -g'' + C^2 g = f \end{equation} and an explicit solution is given by \begin{equation} g(t) = \frac{1}{2C} \int_{\R} e^{-C|t-\tau|} f (\tau)\,\mathrm d\tau. \end{equation}

My attempt. (Skip to the bottom for my question)

Consider the tempered distribution \begin{equation*}\begin{split} \mathscr Z: S(\R;\C)&\to\C, \\ \phi&\mapsto\int_\R e^{-{C\lvert t\rvert}} \phi(t)\,\mathrm dt = \int_0^\infty e^{-Ct}\phi(t)\,\mathrm dt+\int_{-\infty}^0 e^{Ct} \phi(t)\,\mathrm dt. \end{split}\end{equation*} Then we have, for all $\phi\in S(\R;\C)$, \begin{equation*} \langle\mathscr Z',\phi\rangle=-\langle\mathscr Z,\phi'\rangle=\int_0^\infty e^{-Ct}\phi'(t)\,\mathrm dt+\int_{-\infty}^0 e^{Ct} \phi'(t)\,\mathrm dt. \end{equation*} Integrating both terms by parts, where the exponential term gets differentiated and $\phi'$ gets integrated, we get \begin{equation*}\begin{split} -\langle\mathscr Z',\phi\rangle &= \left[e^{-Ct}\phi(t)\right]^\infty_0+C\int_0^\infty e^{-Ct}\phi(t)\,\mathrm dt+\left[e^{Ct}\phi(t)\right]^0_{-\infty}-C\int_{-\infty}^0 e^{Ct}\phi(t)\,\mathrm dt \\ &= C\int_0^\infty e^{-Ct}\phi(t)\,\mathrm dt-C\int_{-\infty}^0 e^{Ct}\phi(t)\,\mathrm dt. \end{split}\end{equation*} Integrating both terms by parts in the same way, we get (where $\delta_0$ is the Dirac distribution at $0$) \begin{equation*}\begin{split} \langle\mathscr Z'',\phi\rangle &= \langle-\mathscr Z',\phi'\rangle \\ &= C\left[e^{-Ct}\phi(t)\right]^\infty_0+C^2\int_0^\infty e^{-Ct}\phi(t)\,\mathrm dt - \left(C \left[e^{Ct}\phi(t)\right]_{-\infty}^0-C^2\int_{-\infty}^0 e^{Ct}\phi(t)\,\mathrm dt\right) \\ &= C^2 \langle\mathscr Z,\phi\rangle-2C\phi(0) = C^2 \langle\mathscr Z,\phi\rangle-2 C\langle{\delta_0,\phi}\rangle. \end{split}\end{equation*}

Now I would like to finish by writing

$$g = \frac{\mathscr Z* f}{2C}$$ and therefore

$$-g''+C^2 g = \frac{-(\mathscr Z'' * f)+C^2 (\mathscr Z* f)}{2C} = \frac{-((C^2\mathscr Z-2C\delta_0)*f)+C^2 (\mathscr Z* f)}{2C}=\delta_0*f = f.$$

My question: However, to do this, I formally use $$ (A*a)'=(A'*a)$$ when $A$ is a distribution. Is there some result that justifies this? And furthermore, does this result also imply that $g$, defined as the convolution of $f$ with $\mathscr Z$, can be written as a $W^{2,2}_{\text{loc}}$ function?

  • $\begingroup$ do u know how $A'$ is defined? $\endgroup$ Aug 7, 2021 at 21:04
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You still have the usual (existence and uniqueness) theory available also for ODEs in this more general interpretation; this is discussed in many books, for example Coddington-Levinson. Your formula is then the variation-of-constants formula for the solutions of an inhomogeneous linear ODE. $\endgroup$ Aug 7, 2021 at 22:00
  • $\begingroup$ @ChristianRemling Thank you! I will check out the Coddington-Levinson book that you mentioned in the next days $\endgroup$ Aug 7, 2021 at 23:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @mathworker21 (I do not know of a sensible way to define the convolution $T*f$ if $T$ is any tempered distribution and $f$ is any $L^2$-function.) $\endgroup$ Aug 7, 2021 at 23:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @mathworker21 ahh I apologize for getting a bit pissed then 😅 $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2021 at 21:51

1 Answer 1


The last step is formally justified by 15.8, differentiation property of José Sebastião e Silva's "Integrals and orders of growth of distributions." (The paper is currently available here.)

More precisely: $\mathscr K$ is defined by a continuous function. Also, by Lemma 8.2 of Haim Brezis' Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations (2010), we have, in the weak sense, since $f\in L^2\subset L^1_{\text{loc}}$, $F'=f$ where $F(x):=\int_0^x f$ is continuous.

Therefore, one can indeed apply 15.8 mentioned above.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.