Before stating the questions that I have, which are very specific and probably not so interesting to someone who has never thought about these things, I need to introduce some notation.

Let $p$ be any prime, and let $D$ be the quaternion algebra over $Q$ ramified precisely at $p$ and infinity. Choose a maximal order $R$ inside $D$. For any prime $\ell\neq p$, fix an isomorphism of $D_\ell:=D\otimes Q_\ell$ with the algebra $M_2(Q_\ell)$ in such a way that the maximal compact subring $R_\ell:=R\otimes Z_\ell$ corresponds to $M_2(Z_\ell)$.

If $N$ is an integer $>0$ not divisible by $p$, let $U_\ell(N)$ be the subgroup of $R_\ell^\star\simeq GL_2(Z_\ell)$ given by those matrices whose bottom row is congruent to $(0$ $1)$ modulo $N$ (equivalently, modulo the highest power of $\ell$ dividing $N$).

The ring $R_p:=R\otimes Z_p$ has a unique maximal, two-sided principal ideal $(\pi)$ generated by any uniformizer $\pi$, the residue field $R/(\pi)$ is a finite field with $p^2$ elements. We let $R_p^\star(1)$ denote the subgroup of $R_p^\star$ given by the units that are congruent to $1$ modulo $(\pi)$.

Let now $D^\star$ be the multiplicative group of $D$, viewed as an algebraic group over $Q$. For any integer $N>0$ not divisible by $p$, we are going to define an open subgroup $U(1,N)$ of the group $D^\star_A$ of points of $D^\star$ valued in $A$, the adele ring of $Q$. Namely $U(1,N)$ is the product of all the $U_\ell(N)$, for $\ell\neq p$; of $R_p^\star(1)$; and of the full (connected) component at infinity $D^\star_\infty$.

Consider the space $S(1,N)$ of complex valued functions on the double coset $D^\star\backslash D^\star_A/U(1,N)$, which is known to be finite. For any prime $\ell\neq p$ there is an Hecke operator $T_\ell$ acting on $S(1,N)$ that can be defined in terms of double cosets in the usual way.

(Let $\alpha_\ell$ be the matrix whose top row is $(\ell$ $0)$ and whose bottom is $(0$ $1)$; decompose $U_\ell(N)\alpha_\ell U_\ell(N)$ as a finite union of left cosets $\gamma_i U_\ell(N)$; for $f\in S(1,N)$ define $T_\ell(f)(x)=\sum f(x\gamma_i)$).

Let $V$ be the vector space of locally constant, complex valued functions on $D^\star_A$ that are left invariant by $D^\star$. Observe that $S(1,N)$ can be viewed as a finite dimensional subspace of $V$. Right translation defines an admissible representation of $D^\star_A$ on $V$ which is known to be completely decomposable into a discrete direct sum of irreducible admissible representations of $D^*_A$. If $f\in S(1,N)$, then denote by $V_f$ the smallest subspace of $V$ that is stable by $D^\star_A$.


1) Let $f\in S(1,N)$, for some $N$. Is it true that the space $V_f$ is finite dimensional if and only if $f:D^\star_A\rightarrow C$ factors through the reduced norm map $Nr:D^\star_A\rightarrow A^\star$?

2) Does the subspace of $S(1,N)$ given by those functions that factor through the reduced Norm admit an Hecke stable complement?

3) Is the action of $T_\ell$ on $S(1,N)$, for $\ell\nmid pN$, semisimple?

4) Assuming that 2) holds, and letting $S_0(1,N)$ be such complement, how do we relate the C-subalgebra $T_0(N)$ of End($S_0(1,N)$) generated by the Hecke operators $T_\ell$, with $\ell\nmid pN$, to a C-algebra of Hecke operators acting on weight 2 cusps forms of a certain level? What I mean is: out of the J-L correspondence, can we read off an isomorphism between $T_0(N)$ and some Hecke algebra coming from classical modular forms?


[EDIT: In the 2nd and 3rd lines above "Questions:" I should have probably have said "discrete Hilbert direct sum", the "direct sum" being only dense in V]


1 Answer 1


1) Yes, I think that's true. I guess it follows relatively easy from the statement that an automorphic representation of the algebraic group $D^\times$ is finite-dimensional iff it's 1-dimensional and factoring through the norm. This latter statement probably follows from strong approximation applied to (the adelic points of the algebraic group associated to) the norm 1 elements of $D^\times$, or you can apply Jacquet-Langlands and move to $GL(2)$ and basically use the standard classification of automorphic representations there.

2) Yes, I think it does. There's some analogue of the Petersson inner product here, right? It's just a combinatorial thing and you can use this. The space $S(1,n)$ is not a mysterious thing: multiplicity 1 etc is all true in this setting and the space is a sum of generalised eigenspaces just like classical spaces of cusp forms.

3) Yes. Use either Jacquet-Langlands and classical results, or mimic the standard proof for $GL(2)$ using the pairing on $S(1,N)$.

4) This question has a bit more meat to it. You seem to be asking what the Jacquet-Langlands correspondence is explicitly. I know something this but it's a bit messy. Let me write down some stuff; the answer isn't quite as "clean" as you'd like it to be though, perhaps.

In $S_0(N)$ you're seeing automorphic representations which have a fixed vector under $R_p^*(1)$. These come in two flavours. The first are those which actually have a fixed vector under all of $R_p^*$. These contribute one dimension, locally, to $S_1(N)$ and under J-L correspond to forms of level $Np$ which are new at $p$ with trivial character. The second sort are those without an $R_p^*$-fixed vector. These are 2-dimensional (I mean their $\pi_p$ is 2-dimensional) [Edit: as Tomasso pointed out, this isn't true. There are some more 1-dimensional ones factoring through the local norm map and coming from tamely ramified but not unramified quasicharacters; let's ignore them in what follows.] and all of $\pi_p$ is fixed by $R_p^*(1)$, so here you're getting 2-dimensional spaces in $S_0(N)$ on which Hecke is acting as scalars (so a super-naive version of multiplicity 1 is failing; what's really going on is that the classical theory of oldforms and newforms works in a completely different way to the behaviour of $S_0(N)$ at $p$). Applying JL, if memory serves, you see forms which are supercuspidal at $p$; their level will be something like $Np^2$, their character will be something like the norm of the character of $\mathbf{F}_{p^2}$ associated to the form on $S_0(N)$. So the answer to your question is "yes, you can write down a classical space of forms that corresponds to $S_0(N)$" but it's not pleasant to write it down---you have to understand the possibilities of what forms of level $Np^2$ look like, and only choose certain of them. It's much easier to understand from the point of view of representation theory, either of $GL(2,\mathbf{Q}_p)$ or the local Weil group.

All this is very well-understood by lots of people here, so feel free to correct me or ask more.

  • $\begingroup$ Kevin, thanks a lot for your answer. I strongly suspected these things to be true, but I never found complete proofs in the literature. I will look more carefully. Concerning your answer to 4), I think there might also be infinite dimensional automorphic representations $\Pi$ arising from S(1,N) whose local component $\pi_p$ at $p$ is one-dimensional and the action of $R^*_p/R^*_p(1)$ is through a non trivial character of order dividing p-1 (a character that factors through the norm to ${\bf F}_p^*$). These guys also should correspond to newforms on the $GL_2$-side with $p^2$ in the level. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 26, 2010 at 18:07
  • $\begingroup$ Can you tell me more about the representations of the Weil group of ${\bf Q}_p$ that these $\pi_p$ correspond to? Are they easy to described starting from the finite dimensional representation of $D_p^*$ given by the local component of $\Pi$? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 26, 2010 at 18:08
  • $\begingroup$ Finally, a consequence of 1) is that, I believe, the subspace of S(1,N) giving rise to finite dimensional representations of the adele group of D^* does not grow with N, it is constant. The corresponding systems of Hecke eigenvalues are of the form $(1+\ell)\psi(\ell)$, where $\psi$ is a Dirichlet character of conductor dividing $p$. I found a bit surprising that Dirichlet characters mod $N$ do not enter the picture. And this was actually the reason why I started to doubt that 1) was correct... Thanks again. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 26, 2010 at 18:08
  • $\begingroup$ Tommaso: if $\pi_p$ is 1-dimensional then the whole of $D_p^\times$ must act via a character. The quotient of $D_p^\times$ by the normal subgroup $R_p^*(1)$ is not abelian though (conjugation by a uniformiser acts via raising to the $p$th power, which is never trivial) so I can't see how $\pi_p$ can be 1-dimensional in your situation with $R_p^\times$ acting via a non-trivial character. Let me know if I made a slip. The Weil group reps are almost "guessable"---the 1-d ones are twists of Steinberg and the 2-d ones are induced from a character on the unramified quadratic extension. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 26, 2010 at 19:09
  • $\begingroup$ There are references for this stuff but I don't know them; I just picked it up by osmosis. Sorry I can't be more helpful. Finally, I don't really understand your comments about things not growing with $N$: don't we pick up more and more Dirichlet characters. In fact we are at odds about Dirichlet characters here! Dirichlet chars give rise to characters of $\mathbf{A}^\times$ and hence to auto reps of $D^\times$ that factor through the norm, right? So I am a bit confused by your comments about growth/Dirichlet chars. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 26, 2010 at 19:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.