2
$\begingroup$

Let $R$ be a PID with field of fraction $K$. Let $L$ be a lattice with non-degenerate quadratic form $q:L\times L \to R$. Let $$ L^* = \{x \in L\otimes K \text{ s.t. } q(x,l) \in R \text{ for all } l \in L \}. $$ By integrality of $q$, we have $L \subseteq L^*$. I heard the following

Claim. The unique decomposition of the quotient $L^*/L$ given by the structure theorem of modules over principal ring is exactly the one given by the Smith normal form of $q$.

I think it should pretty much follow from the definitions, but I'm a bit confused about how the argument goes. I checked OMeara's and Cassel's books but without success. I'd very much welcome a reference. Thanks!

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The following more general statement is easier to prove:

Let $L_1, L_2$ be lattices with a nondegenerate bilinear form $b: L_1 \times L_2 \to R$. Let $$L_1^* = \{ x \in L_2 \otimes K \textrm{ s.t. } b(l,x) \in R \textrm{ for all } l \in L_1 \}$$

Claim: The unique decomposition of the quotient $L_1^*/L_2$ given by the structure theorem of modules over a principal ring is exactly the one given by the Smith normal form of $b$.

Proof: Putting a matrix in Smith normal form involves acting by invertible matrices on the left and the right, which corresponds to invertible changes of coordinates in $L_1$ and $L_2$, which do not affect the quotient $L_1^* /L_2$. So we may assume that $b$ is already in Smith normal form - in particular, is a diagonal matrix with diagonal entries $a_1,\dots, a_n$. Then if $e_1,\dots, e_n$ is a basis for $L_2$, $a_1^{-1} e_1,\dots, a_n^{-1} e_n$ is a basis for $L_1^*$, and so $$L_1^*/L_2 = \prod_i a_i^{-1} e_iR /e_iR =\prod_i R/a_i,$$ as desired.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the great answer! (typo: "Smith normal form of $q$" -> "Smith normal form of $b$"). $\endgroup$
    – user148575
    Commented Jul 28, 2021 at 14:07
  • $\begingroup$ After getting back to this question, I'm thinkind: Where do you actually use non-degeneration? I think if $a_r$ is your last non-zero diagonal entry in the SNF, then $a_1^{-1}e_1,…,a_r^{-1}e_r,e_{r+1},\dots,e_n$ is still a base for $L_1^*$, no? $\endgroup$
    – user148575
    Commented Sep 25, 2021 at 4:16
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @user148575 In the degenerate case, $L_1^*$ looks like $a_1^{-1} e_1 R + \dots + a_r^{-1} R + K E_{r+1} + \dots + K e_n$ and the quotient contains copies of $K/R$. Other than that, the argument works. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Sep 25, 2021 at 12:02

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .