I am reading the book Applications of Diophantine Approximation to Integral Points and Transcendence by Zannier and Corvaja and, after their proof of the Chevalley-Weil theorem, in Example 3.8 they suggest that it is possible to prove the weak Mordell-Weil theorem using Chevalley-Weil. Honestly, I can't see that, but I am very curious. Does anyone have an idea about it?

Thank you in advance!


The multiplication-by-$m$ map $[m]:E\to E$ is unramified, so there exists a finite set of primes $S$, depending only on $E$ and $m$, so that for every $P\in E(K)$, the field generated by the coordinates of the points in $[m]^{-1}(P)$ is unramified outside of $S$. (This is where we use Chevelley-Weil.) The degree of that extension is also bounded as a function of $m$. It follows from standard results in algebraic number theory that there are only finitely many such fields. Hence $[m]^{-1}\bigl(E(K)\bigr)$ is contained in $E(L)$, where the extension $L/K$ is a finite extension.

I'll let you read elsewhere the fact that it suffices to prove the weak Mordell-Weil theorem under the assumption that $E[m]\subset E(K)$. Under that assumption, and with notation as in the first paragraph with $L=K\bigl([m]^{-1}\bigl(E(K)\bigr)\bigr)$, there is a well-defined injective homomorphism $$ E(K)/mE(K) \longrightarrow \operatorname{Hom}\bigl(\operatorname{Gal}(L/K),E[m]\bigr) $$ defined by $$ P \longmapsto \bigl(\sigma\mapsto \sigma(Q)-Q\bigr) \quad\text{for any choice of $Q\in E(L)$ satisfying $[m](Q)=P$.} $$ Since $L/K$ is a finite extension from Chevalley-Weil, and since $E[m]$ is a finite group, this gives the finiteness of $E(K)/mE(K)$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much for your answer! It seems clear to me, I will reflect on this in the following days. $\endgroup$
    – cartesio
    Jul 25 at 19:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.