Let $X$ be a nice scheme (additional assumptions could be added), and let $Et(X)$ be its (Artin-Mazur) etale homotopy type. I am looking for a/the scheme $Y$ over $X$ whose etale homotopy type $Et(Y)$ will be the topological universal cover of $Et(X)$. By definition $Et(X)$ is the geometric realization of a simplicial set, and it was pointed out to me that if $R \rightarrow S$ is the universal cover of a simplicial set $S$, then the geometric realization $|R|$ is the topological universal cover of $|S|$.

What is the meaning of "Universal cover of a simplicial set"; Is there a reference for that, and also for the second assertion?. How could we apply this to find $Y$?

Edit: If we want to avoid the simplicial method. Suppose that there is a scheme $Y$ over $X$ such that

  1. The first etale homotopy group $\pi_1^{et}(Y)$ is trivial.

  2. For all $n \geq 2$ we have $\pi_n^{et}(Y) \simeq \pi_n^{et}(X)$.

Are these conditions sufficient to state that $Et(Y)$ is the topological universal cover of $Et(X)$?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Do you have a universal cover of the multiplicative group $\mathbb G_m$? The conditions that you listed seem to be sufficient if you replace the second by the stronger condition that the map $\pi_n^{\operatorname{ét}}(Y)\to\pi_n^{\operatorname{ét}}(X)$ induced by the map $Y\to X$ is an isomorphism for every $n>1$. However, I suspect that the existence is very rare. $\endgroup$
    – Z. M
    Jul 20, 2021 at 9:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Z.M Thank you for your comment. Yes, the condition you mentioned is exactly the one i meant. $\endgroup$ Jul 25, 2021 at 16:29

1 Answer 1


Such an "étale universal cover" exists at least if $X$ is Noetherian and geometrically unibranch (and for all qcqs $X$ if one considers profinite étale homotopy types).

Background. I will regard the étale homotopy type of a scheme as an object in the $\infty$-category $\mathrm{Pro}(\mathcal S)$ of pro-spaces. In the $\infty$-category $\mathcal S$, the universal cover of a pointed space $(X,x)$ can be characterized as the initial object in the $\infty$-category of pointed $0$-truncated morphisms to $(X,x)$ (i.e., morphisms with discrete fibers). Similarly, one can define $0$-truncated morphisms in $\mathrm{Pro}(\mathcal S)$, and every pointed object admits a universal cover. References for the étale homotopy type and for $n$-truncated/$n$-connected morphisms in $\mathrm{Pro}(\mathcal S)$ are Sections E.2 and E.4.2 in Spectral Algebraic Geometry.

Let $\mathcal S_{<\infty}$ be the $\infty$-category of truncated spaces and let $\mathrm{Et}\colon \mathrm{Sch} \to \mathrm{Pro}(\mathcal S_{<\infty})$ be the protruncated étale homotopy type, which is the homotopy-coherent incarnation of the construction of Artin and Mazur. Under the equivalence $$\mathrm{Pro}(\mathcal S_{<\infty}) \simeq \mathrm{Fun}^\mathrm{acc,lex}(\mathcal S_{<\infty},\mathcal S)^\mathrm{op},$$ $\mathrm{Et}(X)$ is the functor $\mathcal S_{<\infty}\to\mathcal S$ sending a truncated space $K$ to the global sections $\Gamma(X_\mathrm{et},K)$ of the constant étale sheaf on $X$ with value $K$.

Construction. Let $X$ be a scheme with a geometric point $x\colon \operatorname{Spec} k\to X$, with $k$ separably closed. Consider the category $\mathrm{FEt}(X,x)$ of pointed finite étale covers of $X$, that is, factorizations of $x$ through a finite étale morphism $X'\to X$. This category has finite limits and in particular is cofiltered (it is also essentially small). Thus, the limit $\tilde X$ of the forgetful functor $$ \mathrm{FEt}(X,x) \to \mathrm{Sch}_{/X} $$ exists (note that $\tilde X$ depends on $x$, so the notation is abusive). This is a natural candidate for the "universal cover" of $(X,x)$.

Now, the statement that $\mathrm{Et}(\tilde X)\to\mathrm{Et}(X)$ is the universal cover of the pointed pro-space $(\mathrm{Et}(X),x)$ is equivalent to the following three conditions: 1) the map $\mathrm{Et}(\tilde X)\to\mathrm{Et}(X)$ is $0$-truncated, 2) $\mathrm{Et}(\tilde X)$ is connected, and 3) $\pi_1^\mathrm{et}(\tilde X,x)$ is trivial.


1) always holds if $X$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated.

First, I claim that the functor $\mathrm{Et}$ preserves the limit of the diagram defining $\tilde X$. Under the above equivalence of $\infty$-categories, this is the statement that for $K$ a truncated space, $\Gamma((-)_\mathrm{et},K)$ transforms this limit into a colimit, which is a standard property of étale cohomology with respect to inverse limits of qcqs schemes. [Here it is important that $K$ is truncated, otherwise this may not be true.]

Then, if $p\colon X'\to X$ is finite étale, I claim that the morphism $\mathrm{Et}(p)\colon \mathrm{Et}(X')\to \mathrm{Et}(X)$ is $0$-truncated. In fact, it is the pullback of a morphism of groupoids $\pi\colon\Xi'\to\Xi$ with finite discrete fibers. To see this, note that the morphism of étale $\infty$-topoi induced by $p$ is itself the pullback of such a morphism $\pi$. The point is then that for any space $K$, $\Gamma(X'_\mathrm{et}, K)$ is $\Gamma(X_\mathrm{et},p_*K)$ and $p_*K$ is a locally constant sheaf on $X$ in a strong sense: it is the pullback of the sheaf $\pi_*K$ on $\Xi$ (the fact that the fibers of $\pi$ are finite spaces is used here, to commute the pushforward with the pullback). One can thus apply Proposition 2.15 in Higher Galois theory to compute $\Gamma(X_\mathrm{et},p_*K)$ in terms of the étale homotopy type of $X$. Unpacking this formula gives $\mathrm{Et}(X')=\mathrm{Et}(X)\times_\Xi\Xi'$. [Here, $K$ need not be truncated, so $p$ induces a $0$-truncated morphism on actual étale homotopy types, and $X$ need not even be qcqs.]

ETA: If $X$ is locally noetherian, another proof of this claim is Lemma 2.1 in Schmidt-Stix, Anabelian geometry with etale homotopy types.

Finally, since $0$-truncated morphisms are stable under limits, $\mathrm{Et}(\tilde X)\to\mathrm{Et}(X)$ is also $0$-truncated.

2) also holds if $X$ is qcqs. In this case $\tilde X$ is connected, as any clopen subset of $\tilde X$ lifts to a clopen subset of some finite étale $X'\to X$.

3) holds if we assume moreover that the pro-group $\pi_1^\mathrm{et}(X,x)$ is profinite, e.g., $X$ is Noetherian and geometrically unibranch. Then $\pi_1^\mathrm{et}(\tilde X,x)$ is also profinite by 1), so 3) is equivalent to the statement that every finite étale cover of $\tilde X$ is trivial, which holds by construction.

Note that the additional assumption for 3) is not needed if we pass to the profinite completions. That is, if $X$ is qcqs, then $\mathrm{Et}(\tilde X)^\wedge \to \mathrm{Et}(X)^\wedge$ is the universal cover of the profinite étale homotopy type $(\mathrm{Et}(X)^\wedge,x)$.

Example. Let $X=\mathbb G_m$ over a field $k$ of characteristic zero, pointed at $1$ by an algebraic closure $\bar k$ of $k$. Then $\tilde X=\operatorname{Spec}\bar k[t^{\pm 1}][t^{1/n}, n\geq 2]$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your detailed answer. Could we translate the meaning of a n-truncated morphism $Et(Y) \rightarrow Et(X)$ by $\pi_p(Et(Y)) \simeq \pi_p(Et(X))$ for all $p \geq n+2$? $\endgroup$ Jul 25, 2021 at 21:19
  • $\begingroup$ Not quite, $n$-truncated means iso on $\pi_p$ for $p\geq n+2$ and mono on $\pi_{n+1}$. However, for pro-spaces one cannot quite define them this way because pro-spaces may not have enough base points (eg, the set of points could be empty). The actual definition is: a morphism in $\mathrm{Pro}(\mathcal S)$ is $n$-truncated if it is a cofiltered limit of $n$-truncated morphisms in $\mathcal S$. $\endgroup$ Jul 26, 2021 at 5:58
  • $\begingroup$ I guess that the subtlety of $\operatorname{Pro}(\mathcal S)$ disappears if you pass to the profinite completion? $\endgroup$
    – Z. M
    Jul 26, 2021 at 11:10
  • $\begingroup$ @Z.M Indeed profinite space are much better behaved. In particular a morphism of profinite spaces is $n$-truncated iff it is so after passing to the limit, this is Prop. E.4.6.1 in Spectral Algebraic Geometry. In order to be able to check $n$-truncativity using homotopy pro-groups, I would guess that $\pi_0$ being profinite is enough, which is certainly the case for $\mathrm{Et}$ of a qcqs scheme. $\endgroup$ Jul 26, 2021 at 12:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.