2
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a locally Noetherian scheme and $K^{\bullet}$ a perfect complex of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules. We say $K^{\bullet}$ is "formal" if it is quasi-isomorphic to the complex $\bigoplus_{n}H_n(K^{\bullet})[n]$.

Can formality of a perfect complex of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules be checked Zariski-locally on $X$?

Remark. This seems dubious to me, unless there's some natural zigzag between $K^{\bullet}$ and $\bigoplus_nH_n(K^{\bullet})[n]$, in which case it'd be better to define formality in terms of that map in $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$ being an isomorphism. But maybe there's a procedure to build a formal representatives out of local data and I'm just unaware of it.

I'd be interested to know if it's possible. A quick literature search didn't turn up much.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Consider two vector bundles $V,W$ and $\alpha \in {\rm Ext}^2(V,W)$, $\alpha \neq 0$. Then $$C:={\rm cone}(V[1] \to^\alpha W[-1])$$ is a nonsplit complex with $H^0(C) = V$ and $H^1(C) = W$. But $C$ splits locally, because locally $V$ and $W$ are projective.

E.g. we can take $X = \mathbb P^2, V =\mathcal O,$ and $W = \mathcal O(-3)$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.