2
$\begingroup$

This came up when thinking about this question.

It is well-known that the image of a homeomorphic embedding $f:S^n\to \mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ separates the space into exactly two components, one of which is bounded, and another is unbounded. I am interested in "continuity" of this separation with respect to $f$, in the following sense:

Let $x$ be a point in the unbounded component. Let $\varepsilon>0$ be much smaller than the distance from $x$ to $f(S^n)$. Let $g:S^n\to \mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ be such that $\|g(s)-f(s)\|<\varepsilon$, for every $s\in S^n$. It is clear that $x\notin g(S^n)$. If $g$ is a homeomorphism, $g(S^n)$ also separates the space into a bounded an unbounded components, and so $x$ is in one of them.

Is $x$ in the unbounded component?

In fact, is the assumption that $g$ is a homeomorphism needed? Without it we can get a lot of components, but there can be only one unbounded, so the additional question is only whether $g(S^n)$ separates the space.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Yes, if $x$ is in the unbounded component of $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}\setminus f(S^n)$, then $x$ is also in the unbounded complement of $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}\setminus g(S^n)$, for any continuous $g$, provided $g$ is close enough to $f$. Indeed, domains in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ are path connected so there is path $\gamma$ connecting $x$ to infinity that does not meet with $f(S^n)$ and hence it is at a positive distance, say greater than $\varepsilon$, to $f(S^n)$. If $\Vert f-g\Vert<\varepsilon$, then clearly the path $\gamma$ does not meet with $g(S^n)$ and hence $x$ is in the unbounded component of $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}\setminus g(S^n)$, because $\gamma$ connects $x$ to infinity inside a component of $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}\setminus g(S^n)$.

Note, that we not need $g$ to be one-to-one.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ i should have chosen the bounded component, instead of unbounded! somehow the problem is not symmetric.. or is it? $\endgroup$
    – erz
    Commented May 18, 2021 at 23:07
  • $\begingroup$ @erz It is symmetric, because $x$ is in the unbounded component in the complement of the image of $f$ iff it is in the unbounded component in the complement of the image of $g$. Am I right? $\endgroup$ Commented May 18, 2021 at 23:25
  • $\begingroup$ i think you cannot state it in the iff form, because we start from the assumption that $x$ is outside, and then construct $g$. I think the reason for this non-symmetry is that for unbounded component you have a canonical point (infinity), which is going to be outside no matter what. I guess the symmetric version is "for a fixed point $y\in R^n$, if $x$ was connected with $y$ in the complement to $f(S^n)$, it remains connected in the complement to $g(S^n)$, if $g$ is close to $f$ $\endgroup$
    – erz
    Commented May 19, 2021 at 0:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .