7
$\begingroup$

Fix $L \in (0,\infty)$ and consider $\mathcal{C}_L$ defined as follows: \begin{align*} \mathcal{C}_L := \{ \gamma:[0,1] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2 |~ \gamma \text{ is smooth and length($\gamma$)$=L$ }\}. \end{align*}

I am interested in the "blow-up" of $\gamma$, denoted $\gamma_{+r}$, defined as follows: For any set $S \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$ and $r>0$ \begin{align*} S_{+r} := \cup_{z\in S}(z+r\mathbb{D}), \end{align*} where $\mathbb{D}$ is the unit disc in $\mathbb{R}^2$ which is centred at the origin. So $\gamma_{+r}$ is a bounded open set in $\mathbb{R}^2$. My question is for which $\gamma \in \mathcal{C}_L$ is $m(\gamma_{+r})$ maximised? Here $m(\cdot)$ is the Lebesgue measure in $\mathbb{R}^2$. I feel that it should be maximised by the line segment with length $L$.

If this is a version of some well known result, please do indicate it.

The reason for this title is that sometimes the isoperimetric inequality in $\mathbb{R}^2$ is stated as follows: For any Borel subset $A \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$ with $m(A) < \infty$ and for every $\epsilon >0$, we have $m(A_{+\epsilon}) \geq m(B_{+\epsilon})$. Here $B$ is a Euclidean ball with $m(A) = m(B)$.

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ As long as the curvature of $\gamma$ is less than something of the order $1/r$, and there are no "overlaps", the area of the "sausage" $\gamma_{+r}$ will be equal to $2 r L + \pi r^2$, and it is intuitively clear this is the maximal value. I guess this is standard, I vaguely remember having read that somewhere, but unfortunately I do not have a reference. $\endgroup$ Apr 13 at 21:45
5
$\begingroup$

The problem of determining the volume of the tubular neighborhood of a submanifold of Euclidean spaces was studied by Hotelling and Weyl (and then others). See https://www.jstor.org/stable/2371513?seq=1

The amazing result of Weyl is that, as long as the tubular neighborhood has no "overlaps" (in the sense of non-injective normal exponential map) the volume of the tubular neighborhood is independent of (isometric) embedding. (So in the one dimensional case the maximizer is non-unique, since all embeddings are isometric to each other.)

His theorem applies when the submanifold is closed (without boundary); but in your setting of a curve, the end-caps can be explicitly added.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.