2
$\begingroup$

The paper Stable maps and tautological classes of Faber-Pandharipande shows that the Gromov-Witten classes on spaces of relative stable maps of the projective line push forward to tautological classes on moduli spaces of stable curves.

It is claimed on p. 6 that $\overline{M}_{g,0}(\mu_1,\ldots,\mu_m)=\overline{H}_g(\mu_1,\ldots,\mu_m)$, that is, the space of relative stable maps with ramification profiles $\mu_i$ over marked points of $\mathbb{P}^1$ is equal to the space of admissible covers of a genus 0 curve. However, I am confused as to how this can be correct: if the degree is 1, then I believe the space on the right is empty, but the space on the left has many components in general, coming from starting with the identity map on $\mathbb{P}^1$ and attaching ghost components of positive genus to the source. More generally, I don't see how the presence of ghost components allow one to identify a stable map with an admissible cover.

Later Proposition 1 it is stated as a corollary the fundamental class of $\overline{H}_g$ pushes forward to a tautological class on $\overline{M}_{g,n}$, but because of the discrepancy above I don't see why this is immediate.

Am I missing something?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

The claim is that these moduli spaces coincide under the numerical condition that $$ 2g−2 + 2d=\sum_{i=1}^m (d−\ell(\mu_i)).$$ In this case there will be no ramification points outside the fibers $f^{-1}(q_i)$ and no contracted components on the domain curve. Indeed any contracted component must have positive genus by stability since $n=0$, so any additional ramification or contracted component would force the genus of the domain curve to be strictly greater than $g$ (since $g$ is the genus of an admissible cover with this profile by Riemann-Hurwitz).

In the example $d=1$ that you mentioned the numerical condition is only satisfied when $g=0$, since the right hand side must be zero.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.