2
$\begingroup$

By $\mathcal{S}$ let us denote the set of such step functions $f:[0,1]\to [0,1]$ that additionally satisfy: $$\forall_{ x>\frac{1}{2}} \ \ \lambda\Big(f=x\Big) \ = \ x\cdot \Big[\lambda\Big(f=x\Big)+\lambda\Big(f=1-x\Big)\Big],$$ and $$\forall_{ x>\frac{1}{2}} \ \ \lambda\Big(f=1-x\Big) \ = \ (1-x)\cdot \Big[\lambda\Big(f=x\Big)+\lambda\Big(f=1-x\Big)\Big],$$ where $\lambda$ is simply the Lebesgue measure. This means that measure designated to the set $\{x,1-x\}$ is split proportionaly between the points $x$ and $1-x$.

I am interested in evaluating (finding or bounding) $$\sup_{f \in \mathcal{S}} \ \int\limits_{0}^{1}\Big|f^i-f^d\Big|^p \ \mathrm{d}\lambda, $$ where $f^i$ and $f^d$ are increasing and decreasing rearrangements of $f$ and $p>1$: enter image description here

My questions are:

  • Have You seen similar problems? What is Your guess, how could one deal with such wired optimization?
  • I suspect that the number of values attained by the best $f$ is equal $3$ $-$ namely $(1, x, 1-x)$ for some $x$. Do You know any methods that could be helpful in proving that the number of values of $f$ under the consideration could be bounded by some value? I was thinking about Caratheodory theorem from convex geometry, but I don't see any way of applying it.

Thank You for any insight.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by increasing and decreasing rearrangements of $f$? $\endgroup$ Feb 28, 2021 at 21:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I have added a graphical explanation. $\endgroup$
    – user153000
    Feb 28, 2021 at 22:48

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.