1
$\begingroup$

So the title is quite self-explanatory,

suppose we have a stochastic process $(X_t: t\in[0,T])$ where for a fixed $t$, $X_t$ is a $\mathbb R$-valued square integrable random variable, we could even assume it's in the Gaussian Sobolev space $\mathbb D^{1,2}$. Then in which cases does the following hold?

$$D_u \int_0^t b(s,X_s)ds= \int_0^t D_u[b(s,X_s)]ds$$

where $D_u$ stands for the Malliavin derivative at time $u$.

I tried searching for this in Nualarts book, but I haven't found a proof, or the necessary conditions. Furthermore this seems to be done quite often when dealings with SDEs.

Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The hypotheses are sometimes stated differently, depending on the kind of processes you have in mind. The following is taken from Pratelli's lecture notes, Theorem 3.2.1, but he gives no further reference.

Theorem. Let $(X_t)_{t \in [0,T]}$ be a stochastic process such that for all $0\leq t \leq T$ we have $X_t \in \mathbb D^{1,2}$; also suppose that there is a measurable version of $D_sX_t$ on $\Omega \times [0,T] \times [0,T]$ such that $\int_0^T \| X_t \|_{\mathbb D^{1,2}}^2\, \mathrm{d}t<+\infty$. Then $\int_0^T X_t\, \mathrm{d}t$ is in $\mathbb D^{1,2}$ and $$D_s \int_0^T X_t\,\mathrm{d}t = \int_0^T D_sX_t\,\mathrm{d}t$$ for a.e. $0 \leq s \leq T$.

The proof only needs the following fact.

Lemma. We have $F \in \mathbb D^{1,2}$ and $DF=Z$, iff $F \in L^2(\Omega)$ and there is $Z \in L^2(\Omega \times [0,T])$ such that, for any smooth functional $G$ and any square-integrable $h$, the following equation holds: $$\mathbb E \left [\left (\int _0^T Z_s h(s)\, \mathrm{d}s \right )G \right] = \mathbb E \left [ -FD_h G + FGW(h) \right]. $$ This makes the usual integration by parts into a characterization of the Malliavin derivative (compare with Lemma 1.2.2 of Nualart). You can find a proof in Chapter 5 of Bogachev's Gaussian Measures.

With this, the proof of the Theorem is easy. Take the equation $$\mathbb E \left [\left (\int _0^T D_sX_t h(s)\, \mathrm{d}s \right )G \right] = \mathbb E \left [ -X_tD_h G + X_tGW(h) \right],$$ then integrate with respect to $t$ and interchange integrals (Fubini+Cauchy-Schwarz) to get $$\mathbb E \left [\left (\int _0^T \left ( \int_0^T D_sX_t \, \mathrm{d}t \right) h(s)\, \mathrm{d}s \right )G \right] = \mathbb E \left [ \left ( -\int_0^T X_t \, \mathrm{d}t \right)D_h G + \left ( \int_0^T X_t \, \mathrm{d}t \right)GW(h) \right].$$ You can then apply the Lemma again, since $\int_0^T X_t \, \mathrm{d}t$ is in $L^2$, which tells you exactly that $$D_s \int_0^T X_t\,\mathrm{d}t = \int_0^T D_sX_t\,\mathrm{d}t.$$

I imagine that you cannot find a precise reference since most works that study applications are not particularly concerned with precise statements, and the proof is not hard anyway.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ this is a very nice way to prove it! I don't know why I was expecting something quite involved, but this is a straightforward consequence of the integration by parts. By the way is this a set of notes of some course? If yes from which university? I also live in Italy and I didn't know Pratelli $\endgroup$
    – Chaos
    Commented Feb 3, 2021 at 15:55
  • $\begingroup$ I think that the approximation argument from the linked MSE post is the most straightforward low-tech approach, since it doesn't need the Lemma I quoted. The notes are from a course Pratelli (who works mostly on this stuff and mathematical finance) taught at the University of Pisa some years ago, I couldn't find the course page and thus the references for the content (which is surely well-known if not folklore). I'd guess since Da Prato also works in Pisa you might have some luck searching through his books on the topic. $\endgroup$
    – user41593
    Commented Feb 3, 2021 at 17:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .