8
$\begingroup$

The basic idea of this question is to see if there is any other derivations than 'formal derivations'.

Let $\mathbb{K}$ be a field. Given a commutative $\mathbb{K}$-algebra $A$, a derivation of $A$ is a $\mathbb{K}$-linear map $D:A\rightarrow A$ satisfying $D(ab)=D(a)b+ aD(b)$. Consider the case when $\mathbb{K}=\mathbb{R}$ and the algebra $A$ is the formal power series $\mathbb{R}[[x]]$. One derivation of $\mathbb{R}[[x]]$ is $p(x)\frac{\partial}{\partial x}$, defined formally as $$ p(x) \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(\sum_{n=0}^\infty c_n x^n \right)=p(x)\cdot \left(\sum_{n=0}^\infty n\cdot c_n x^{n-1}\right)$$ for any $p(x)\in \mathbb{R}[[x]]$. My question is that, are there any derivations that is not of the form $p(x)\frac{\partial}{\partial x}$ as above? If yes, is there any reference/proof/example for existence of such derivations?

This question arose when I was thinking of vector fields of a $\mathbb{Z}$-graded manifold as a derivation of smooth functions. With my notion of graded manifolds, smooth functions are formal power series of virtual coordinates.

When I was thinking about it, since $\mathbb{R}[[x]]$ is not generated by $\{x\}$ as an algebra, there should be some other derivations but I could not make it clear. Any help to figure it out would be greatly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ When $K$ has char. zero, there are nonzero derivations of $K((x))$ that vanish on $K[x]$. But I don't know it it can be arranged to map $K[[x]]$ into itself. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Feb 3, 2021 at 8:27

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

Every $\mathbb{K}$-derivation $D$ of $\mathbb{K}[[x_1,\dots,x_n]]$ has the standard form $$D(f)=\sum_{i=1}^n p_i \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i},$$ where of course $p_i=D(x_i)$.
Indeed, let $\mathfrak{m}$ be the maximal ideal of $\mathbb{K}[[x_1,\dots,x_n]]$: then clearly $D(\mathfrak{m}^{N+1})\subset \mathfrak{m}^N$ for all $N\geq0$, so $D$ is continuous for the $\mathfrak{m}$-adic topology. The claim follows because the formula holds when $f$ is a polynomial, $\mathbb{K}[x_1,\dots,x_n]$ is dense in $\mathbb{K}[[x_1,\dots,x_n]]$, and $\mathbb{K}[[x_1,\dots,x_n]]$ is Hausdorff.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I wonder what's the answer for derivations of the ring $R$ of germs of smooth functions near the origin in $\mathbb{R}^n$. This maps surjectively to $\mathbb{R}[\![x_1,\dotsc,x_n]\!]$ with kernel $\mathfrak{m}^\infty\neq 0$. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 3, 2021 at 9:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer. I have been thinking about it but I was not sure why it $D(\mathfrak{m}^{N+1}) \subset \mathfrak{m}^N$ has to be satisfied. With this answer, my question is, in some sense, equivalent to understand why it HAS TO satisfy that continuity condition. $\endgroup$
    – sock
    Commented Feb 5, 2021 at 2:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @sock $\mathfrak m^{N+1}$ is generated by elements of the form $\prod_{i=1}^{N+1} f_i$ with $f_i \in \mathfrak m$. Now apply $D(ab)=a D(b)+ D(a) b$ $N$ times.... $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Feb 5, 2021 at 2:56
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @sock More generally, the same argument shows that for any ring $R$, ideal $I$, and $R$-module $M$, every derivation $D:R\to M$ is $I$-adically continuous (more precisely, $D(I^{N+1})\subset I^N M$). This does not help very much if $M$ is not $I$-adically separated: for instance, as YCor observed, there are nonzero derivations on $\mathbb{K}[[x]]$ with values in $\mathbb{K}(\!x)\!)$, that vanish on $\mathbb{K}[x]$. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 5, 2021 at 10:02
  • $\begingroup$ A more detailed proof can be found under theorem 1.5.2 in page 12 of www-users.mat.umk.pl/~anow/ps-dvi/pol-der.pdf. $\endgroup$
    – exfret
    Commented Aug 5, 2021 at 13:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.