2
$\begingroup$

I am looking for a proof of the following statement:

Let $X$ be a complete Busemann space. For any point $x\in X$ and any nonempty closed convex set $A\subseteq X$, there is a unique $a\in A$ such that $d(x,a) = d(x,A)$.

Some context:

By a Busemann space, I mean a geodesic metric space such that for any two affinely parametrized geodesics, $\gamma_0$ and $\gamma_1$, the map $(s,t)\mapsto d(\gamma_0(s),\gamma_1(t))$ is convex. In Papadopoulos' Metric Spaces, Convexity and Nonpositive Curvature, the above statement is given as Proposition 8.4.8. However, I found the proof rather unconvincing as it addresses uniqueness but not existence (existence is not clarified earlier in the text). In Bridson and Haefliger's Metric Spaces of Non-positive Curvature there is a nice proof for CAT(0) spaces, but it doesn't seem to directly generalize to the weaker curvature condition of Busemann spaces.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ If I'm not mistaken, one can argue that $d^2/2$ is strictly convex if $d$ is convex. And with strict convexity, for every $x$ we deduce the uniqueness of $argmin_{a\in A} d^2(x,a)/2$, from which uniqueness of $argmin_{a\in A} d(x,a)$ follows. The strict convexity of quadratic distance $d^2/2$ versus the convexity of $d$ is basically why $L^2$ optimal transport is so regular and $L^1$ optimal transport more difficult. $\endgroup$
    – JHM
    Jan 8, 2021 at 0:46
  • $\begingroup$ @JHM Using the strict convexity of $d^2$ makes sense for uniqueness. It's more the existence part that is evading me. $\endgroup$
    – Logan Fox
    Jan 8, 2021 at 18:06
  • $\begingroup$ The infimum $\inf_{a\in A} d(x,a)$ obviously exists since $d\geq 0$. If $d$ is proper, then every minimizing sequence will be contained in a compact ball, and there will exist a convergent subsequence. Without $d$ proper, there is another possibility, using fact that convex hulls of finite subsets is always compact in nonpositive curvature (convex hull of finite subset is the continuous image of a compact simplex). If $d$ nonproper and $A$ noncompact, then i think minimum possibly does not exist. $\endgroup$
    – JHM
    Jan 9, 2021 at 0:53

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2
$\begingroup$

It turns out this statement is not true without additional conditions on the space. See this counterexample for a closed convex set in as strictly convex Banach space which does not admit a metric projection from the origin (every strictly convex Banach space is Busemann).

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.