6
$\begingroup$

I am reading a paper called A NOTE ON THE RADICAL OF A MODULE CATEGORY by CLAUDIA CHAIO AND SHIPING LIU. This is Theorem 2.7: enter image description here

And this is part of it's proof, in which the direction (2) $\Rightarrow $ (1) is shown.

enter image description here

$\iota_S: S \rightarrow I(S)$ denotes the injective envelope and $\pi_S: P(S) \rightarrow S$ denotes the projective cover of a simple module $S$. Also dp$(f)$ denotes the depth of $f$. As far as I know a quiver is locally finite means iff between each two vertices there is only a finite number of arrows between them

I really don't understand why it follows that the Auslander-Reiten component $\Gamma$ is finite. Also why does $\Gamma$ contain at most finitely many indecomposable injective modules?
Can anybody help with his? Any help is highly appreciated!

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Since $A$ is an Artin algebra, it has only finitely many indecomposable injective modules in total (up to isomorphism), so there are finitely many in $\Gamma$.

In a locally finite quiver, given any $d\geq0$ and vertex $v$, there are finitely many paths ending at $v$ and having length at most $d$, because there are finitely many choices for each arrow. In particular, $v$ is reachable from only finitely many vertices by such paths.

This means that there only finitely many vertices of $\Gamma$ from which one of the finitely many indecomposable injectives may be reached via a path of length at most $d$, for any fixed $d>0$. Since the proof exhibits an $r$ such that every vertex of $\Gamma$ has a path of length at most $r$ to some indecomposable injective, it follows that $\Gamma$ has finitely many vertices.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ thank you very much! But how does the proof show that very vertex of $\Gamma$ is reachable from one of the finitely many indecomposable injectives via a path of length at most $r$? Doesn't the proof only show that from each vertex of $\Gamma$ there exists a path of length at most $r$ to one of the indecomposable injectives? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 1, 2021 at 12:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oops, sorry for the confusion: the same statement holds for paths ending at $v$ though (by a very similar argument, or by just considering the opposite quiver, which is also locally finite). I changed the statement in my answer to be more compatible with the proof you cited. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 1, 2021 at 15:34
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, this helped a lot :) $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 1, 2021 at 16:13

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .