1
$\begingroup$

Consider the special unitary group SU(8) acting on $\mathbb{C}^8\stackrel{\sim}{=}(\mathbb{C}^2)^{\otimes 3}$.

In particular, I am interested in the two subgroups $G_1=\mathrm{id}_{\mathbb{C}^2}\otimes SU(4)$ and $G_2=SU(4)\otimes \mathrm{id}_{\mathbb{C}^2}$. The product $G_1G_2$ is not itself a subgroup and I know that it is a semialgebraic set by the Tarski-Seidenberg theorem and closed in the Lie-group topology. What I would like to know is whether $G_1G_2$ is a (real) algebraic set. I suspect that this is not the case but I cannot prove it.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ "... whether this subgroup is a (real) algebraic set": what subgroup? $\endgroup$
    – abx
    Dec 23, 2020 at 16:23
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I meant to write „...this subset“. I edited the question. $\endgroup$
    – BGJ
    Dec 23, 2020 at 18:39

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Yes, $G_1G_2\subset\mathrm{SU}(8)$ is an algebraic set. Here is the argument:

Let $G_1{\times}G_2$ act on $\mathrm{SU}(8)\subset\mathrm{End}(\mathbb{C}^8)\simeq\mathbb{C}^{64}$ by the rule $(g_1,g_2)\cdot h = g_1hg_2^{-1}$.

Then $G_1G_2\subset \mathrm{SU}(8)\subset\mathrm{End}(\mathbb{C}^8)\simeq\mathbb{C}^{64}$ is the orbit of $I_8$ under this action. In particular, it is a smooth submanifold of $\mathrm{SU}(8)$ (of dimension $\dim(G_1)+\dim(G_2)-\dim(G_1{\cap}G_2) = 27$).

Since $G_1{\times}G_2$ is compact, we know that the algebra of $G_1{\times}G_2$-invariant polynomials on $\mathbb{C}^{64}$ separates $G_1{\times}G_2$-orbits, so there exists a finite set $\rho_1,\rho_2,\cdots,\rho_m$ of $G_1{\times}G_2$-invariant (real-valued) polynomials on $\mathbb{C}^{64}$ such that $$ G_1G_2 = \{h\in \mathbb{C}^{64}\ |\ \rho_1(h) = \cdots =\rho_m(h) = 0\ \}. $$ Thus, $G_1G_2$ is an algebraic set.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot. This is a very elegant argument. I know that this is a follow-up question but I can‘t resist: This argument does not seem to generalize to $G_1G_2G_1$. Can it nevertheless be an algebraic set? If not, has it a manifold structure? $\endgroup$
    – BGJ
    Dec 24, 2020 at 8:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @BGJ: You are correct that the argument doesn't generalize to cover $G_1G_2G_1$. I don't know whether this is an algebraic set or whether it is a manifold. However, I can say that there are certainly cases of $G_1$ and $G_2$ that are compact subgroups of a Lie group $G$ for which $G_1G_2G_1$ is not a smooth manifold. $\endgroup$ Dec 24, 2020 at 10:58
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. That helps a lot. $\endgroup$
    – BGJ
    Dec 24, 2020 at 13:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.