4
$\begingroup$

Let us say that $A$ is a (finite-dimensional) algebra over a field of characteristic zero. We can assume commutativity but not associativity, if that makes it easier. Indeed, I am mostly interested in the case of complex Jordan algebras.

Question: What is known about left-multiplication operators $L_a:A\to A$, $L_ax=ax$, that are derivations of $A$, in the sense that $L_a(xy)=(L_ax)y+x(L_ay)$ for all $x$, $y\in A$? What about algebras such that all left-multiplications are derivations?

I think these are never semisimple algebras. An obvious remark is that $A^3=0$ is a sufficient condition for $L(A)\subset\mathrm{Der}(A)$.

(Of course, Lie algebras fit that category.)

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe you could define explicitly $M(A)$ as the set of $a$ such that $L_a$ is a derivation. This is a subspace. I don't know whether it's a subalgebra in general, I guess not (but unsure esp. in the commutative case). What are you asking exactly about $M(A)$? $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Dec 1, 2020 at 5:06
  • $\begingroup$ $M(A)$ certainly does not look like a subalgebra, I do not know exactly what to expect from $M(A)$. I was just doing some calculations and I was wondering whether there was some underlying structure that could simplify them. As it turns out, from this short discussion now I feel like we cannot expect too much from $M(A)$. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 2, 2020 at 0:29

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

An algebra whose (left) multiplications are derivations is referred to as a (left) Leibniz algebra (or Loday algebra). There is a large literature about this class of non-associative algebras. See e.g. the following survey by Joerg Feldvoss: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07219.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, it is a very interesting reference! I have only browsed it, but I will read it more carefully. It still remains the first question: what about algebras in which some left multiplications are derivations? Perhaps some ideas in Feldvoss' paper can also help understand this question. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 1, 2020 at 1:00
  • $\begingroup$ Note that a commutative left-Leibniz algebra (over a ring with $2$ invertible) is somewhat degenerate: it's the same as an algebra (module + bilinear law) $A$ satisfying $A^3=0$ (so it's also associative, Jordan, etc). $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Dec 1, 2020 at 5:07

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .