9
$\begingroup$

Suppose I have a (finite, real, central, essential) hyperplane arrangement $\mathcal{H}$ such that all regions "have the same shape": for any two regions $R,R'$, there is an orthogonal transformation taking $R$ to $R'$ (these transformations are not required to do anything nice to the rest of the arrangement). Is $\mathcal{H}$ necessarily a reflection arrangement?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is more restricted than what you ask, but in this preprint I prove that if the arrangement is transitive on the regions, then it is a reflection arrangement (though it is proven via a dual formulation with zonotopes, see also this question). You probably know that an arrangement with congruent (aka. same-shaped) regions must be simplicial. As far as I know, no classification of simplicial arrangements exists beyond 3D (and I am not sure whether 3D is settled). $\endgroup$ – M. Winter Nov 12 '20 at 15:32
11
$\begingroup$

This is a known open problem (for isometric regions), which, as far as I know, is still not settled.

The dimension 3 case was proved affirmatively in https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.05991, where also some history of the question is outlined. I am not aware of any progress since.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.