In Galois extensions of structured ring spectra, Rognes introduces the notion of a faithful $G$-Galois extension of ring spectra. Let me recall what this means:
We have a commutative ring spectrum $R$ with an action of $G$, and a $G$-equivariant morphism of commutative ring spectra $S\to R$ where $S$ has the trivial $G$-action. This is a $G$-Galois extension if:
i) The canonical map $S\to R^{hG}$ is an equivalence
ii) The canonical map $R\otimes_S R\to F(G_+,R)$ is an equivalence
iii) $R$ is a faithful $S$-module
This makes sense for stably dualizable topological groups and in fact for my question, I'm interested in topological groups that aren't finite discrete. I am, however, happy to restrict to groups that have the homotopy type of a finite CW-complex.
He proves the following result, of which I will sketch a proof at the end of the post for convenience, and to perhaps understand my question better (proposition 7.2.2.in [Rog08]):
If $K$ is an allowable subgroup of $G$, then $R^{hK}\to R$ is a faithful $K$-Galois extension.
Here, an allowable subgroup is a subgroup $K$ which is stably dualizable, such that $G_{hK}\simeq^{stably} G/K$, and such that there exists a continuous section of $G\to G/K$.
My question is the following :
Is this last condition about the existence of a continuous section necessary to get this result ?
In my sketch of the proof below I will point out precisely where we use it - I don't follow the exact same proof as Rognes, but we use the hypothesis for essentially the same thing.
An obvious remark is that when $G$ is finite discrete, this continuous section always exists, so there is no problem there (and in fact every subgroup is allowable). When $G$ splits as a product (topologically, but in particular if it splits as a product of topological groups) $K\times G/K$ then the section obviously exists, which is what allows for instance Mathew to induct on $n$ when looking at $\mathbb T^n$-Galois extensions in Torus actions on stable module categories, Picard groups and localizing subcategories.
Of course, the best answer would be a proof that doesn't use this condition, or an example where the result fails. Most of the examples I know are finite groups, so I'm not really sure what to look for.
An example where the condition fails is $S^1$ with any finite subgroup, but one would have to find $S^1$-Galois extensions.
Sketch of proof: I will use Mathew's language of descendability, which he uses in [Mat15] to give an alternative characterization of $G$-Galois extensions, cf. proposition 3.7. in that paper.
$R$ is dualizable over $S$, by 6.2.1 in [Rog08] (of course this doesn't refer to subgroups, so I won't expand on the proof of that fact), and faithful by definition. Therefore, by Thm 3.38 in The Galois group of a stable homotopy theory, $S\to R$ admits descent.
It follows that $R^{hH}\to R\otimes_S R^{hH}$ also admits descent. Let's call that new algebra $\tilde R$. We can now check $H$-Galois-ness of $R^{hH}\to R$ by tensoring with $\tilde R$ : $\tilde R\to \tilde R\otimes_{R^{hH}}R\simeq R\otimes_S R\simeq F(G_+,R)$. Now $\tilde R = R\otimes_S R^{hH}\simeq F(G/H_+,R)$ because $R$ is dualizable and $G_{hH}\simeq G/H$, so this map is $F(G/H_+,R)\to F(G_+,R)$.
If we have a section, we can identify this map with the canonical map $F(G/H_+,R)\to F(H_+,F(G/H_+,R))$ and so by proposition 3.7. in [Mat15], we get that $R^{hH}\to R$ is indeed $H$-Galois.
Of course this is just a sketch, one needs to identify the maps a bit more precisely.
I guess this reduces the question to looking at $G$-Galois extensions of the form $R\to F(G_+,R)$ i.e. the "trivial ones", in other words,
what do we need for $F(G/H_+,R)\to F(G_+,R)$ to be an $H$-Galois extension ? Are there cases with no section where this fails ?
But for instance whenever $G$ is connected, $G\to G/H$ is a principal $H$-bundle and $\pi_1(G/H)$ acts nilpotently on $H_*(G;\mathbb F_p)$, proposition 5.6.3. of [Rog08] will yield a positive answer for $R= \mathbb F_p$, so not "any" counterexample will work. For instance, these conditions are satisfied by $S^1\to S^1$ which is indeed a $\mathbb Z/p$-principal bundle.
References:
[Rog08] : Galois extensions of structured ring spectra, arxiv:math/0502183
[Mat15]: Torus actions on stable module categories, Picard groups and localizing subcategories, arXiv:1512.01716
[Mat16]: The Galois group of a stable homotopy theory, arXiv:1404.2156