3
$\begingroup$

I've been reading about coherence problems in homotopy type theory (regarding semisimplicial sets and a raw syntax interpreter), and I've seen a remark about higher-dimensional operads perhaps being the notion which would enable one to encode coherence data into equality (I think they said this about judgemental equality).

So I got to opetopes. I remember reading about some applications of opetopes/opetopic sets outside higher-dimensional category theory (something like biological or social systems, I think), but I have forgotten where it was and haven't been able to find them.

Could someone point me to papers/websites discussing unorthodox applications of opetopes?

I'm doing my final work for IT classes about opetopes, and it could be more interesting if I were able to demonstrate more diverse range of use cases.

Many thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is this what you call a dodecahedron in Wisconsin? $\endgroup$ – Sam Hopkins Oct 16 at 14:19
6
$\begingroup$

Opetopes arose long before homotopy type theory, back when mathematicians were trying to find the "right" definition of a weak $n$-category. They were invented by Baez and Dolan as part of a research program to model topological quantum field theories using higher category theory. So, stretching the meaning of the word "application" one could say there was an application of opetopes to mathematical physics.

After their invention, the theory of opetopes was developed by Makkai and by Eugenia Cheng (and also the book by Aaron Lauda and Eugenia Cheng). I haven't read Makkai's paper but it seems to connect opetopes to logic. Opetopes also appear in Leinster's book where they are connected to Universal Algebra, i.e., encoding all sorts of types of algebra (associative/commutative multiplication, distributive law, symmetric multicategory, etc.) using higher operads. And, of course, to higher category theory.

Another great paper, Polynomial functors and opetopes, connects opetopes to polynomial monads, and provides algorithms and code for them, for computing things about and with opetopes (e.g., calculating sources, targets, and gluing).

Now, parallel to all this, you had folks like André Ehresmann thinking about how to use category theory in neuroscience and biology. And, indeed, there was speculation about how to use opetopes for applications in biology. I think Ehresmann was interested in using category theory to model systems-level interactions, so that could, indeed be used for social systems as well. If you are interested in these kinds of applications of category theory, I recommend David Spivak's book, Category Theory for the Sciences. Here is a link to an older but free draft.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I would add that Baez & Dolan introduction of opetopes was more precisely in order to give one of the first (I think the first to be published ?) définition of weak $\infty$-categories and $(\infty,n)$-categories. In their papers, Opetopes serve as a combinatorial tool to record higher coherence conditions. $\endgroup$ – Simon Henry Oct 16 at 16:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.