The following construction have always bugged me. This is p328, Remark 5.1.6.1 in Lurie's Higher Topos Theory. Lurie begins with the following:
Construction: Let $C$ be a simplicial set. $S$ denote the $\infty$-category of small spaces. $s$ a vertex. Composing the Yoneda embedding $$j:C \rightarrow P(C)$$ by the evaluation map $$e_s: P(C)=Fun(C^{op}, S) \rightarrow Fun(\{ s \}, S)\simeq S$$ We obtain the map $j_s:=e_s\circ j:C \rightarrow S$. Where $j_s$ is referred to as the functor correpresented by $s$.
The remark states that we should replace $S$ by $\widehat{S}$ the large $\infty$-category of spaces.
I agree this is what we do 1-categorically when $S$ is replaced with sets.
Q1. But provided this construction makes sense, what's wrong with not replacing it?
Q2. Now suppose we are to work with it $\widehat{S}$. Is it safe to regard $Fun(C,S)$ as a fullsubcategory $Fun(C,\widehat{S})$? What do we know about the inclusion $S \hookrightarrow \widehat{S}$ i.e. if this inclusion is
- limit/colimit preserving
- conservative
?
(Unfortuantely I am unable to work through the material after this - which may answer the above questions)