This question is essentially a reposting of this question from Math.SE, which has a partial answer. YCor suggested I repost it here.

Our starting point is a theorem of Matumoto: every group $Q$ is the outer automorphism group of some group $G_Q$ [1]. It seems to be a research theme to place restrictions on the groups involved. For example, Bumagin and Wise proved that if we restrict $Q$ to be countable then we may take $G_Q$ to be finitely generated [2], and more recently Logan proved that if we restrict $Q$ to be finitely generated and residually finite group then we may take $G_Q$ to be residually finite [3, Corollary D] (this paper also cites quite a few other papers which play this game).

However, all the results I have found always produce infinite groups $G_Q$, even when the "input" groups $Q$ are finite. For example, Matumoto's groups $G_Q$ are fundamental groups of graphs of groups (so are always infinite), Bumagin and Wise use a variant of Rips' construction (so (as $Q$ is finite) their groups $G_Q$ have finite index in metric small cancellation groups, so are infinite), and Logan's groups $G_Q$ are HNN-extensions of hyperbolic triangle groups (so again are infinite). So we have a question:

Does every finite group $Q$ occur as the outer automorphism group of some finite group $G_Q$?

The answer is "yes" if we take $Q$ to be finite abelian or a symmetric group; this is what the answer to the original Math.SE question proves.

[1] Matumoto, Takao. "Any group is represented by an outerautomorphism group." Hiroshima Mathematical Journal 19.1 (1989): 209-219. (Project Euclid)

[2] Bumagin, Inna, and Daniel T. Wise. "Every group is an outer automorphism group of a finitely generated group." Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 200.1-2 (2005): 137-147. (doi)

[3] Logan, Alan D. "Every group is the outer automorphism group of an HNN-extension of a fixed triangle group." Advances in Mathematics 353 (2019): 116-152. (doi, arXiv)

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ As a specific instance, what about $Q = A_5$? $\endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Sep 24, 2020 at 10:42
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Any finite groups with outer automorphism group isomorphic to $Q_8$ or $A_4$? $\endgroup$ Sep 24, 2020 at 10:51
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ $C_2 \times C_2 \times C_2 \times C_2$ has (outer) automorphism group isomorphic to $A_8$, so we can get (at least one) non-abelian simple alternating group. I don't know about $A_5$. $\endgroup$ Sep 24, 2020 at 12:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @KasperAndersen: I don't know. One can show that $\operatorname{Aut}(G) \not\cong Q_8$ and $\operatorname{Inn}(G) \not\cong Q_8$ for all finite groups $G$. There is an infinite abelian group $G$ with $\operatorname{Out}(G) \cong Q_8$, by "de Vries, H.; de Miranda, A. B. Groups with a small number of automorphisms. Math. Z 68 1958 450–464." $\endgroup$ Sep 25, 2020 at 15:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @YCor: I managed to find an $\text{Alt}_4$ example directly: Consider the group (of order $2^7\cdot 7$) given as the semidirect product of the elementary abelian group $E=(C_2)^6 = \mathbf{F}_8\times \mathbf{F}_8$ and $Q=C_{14} =C_2\times C_7$, where $Q$ acts on $E$ by letting $C_2$ swap the two copies of $\mathbf{F}_8$ and letting $C_7=\mathbf{F}_8^*$ act diagonally. $\endgroup$ Sep 30, 2020 at 10:20

2 Answers 2



For each finite group $Q$ I'll construct a finite group $H$ with $\mathrm{Out}(H)\simeq Q$, moreover $H$ will be constructed as a semidirect product $D\ltimes P$, with $P$ a $p$-group of exponent $p$ and nilpotency class $<p$, (with prime $p$ arbitrary chosen $>|Q|+1$) and $D$ abelian of order coprime to $p$ (actually $D$ being a power of a cyclic group of order $p-1$).

I'll use Lie algebras which are convenient tools to encode $p$-groups when $p$ is less than the nilpotency class, taking advantage of linear algebra.

In Lie algebras, we denote $[x_1,\dots,x_m]=[x_1,[x_2,\dots,[x_{m-1},x_m]\cdots]]$. Also I choose the convention to let permutations act on the left.

The base field is $K=\mathbf{F}_p$, $p$ prime. Fix $n\ge 1$. Let $\mathfrak{f}_n$ be the free Lie $K$-algebra on generators $(e_1,\dots,e_n)$. It admits a unique grading in $\mathbf{Z}^n$ such that $e_i$ has degree $E_i$, where $(E_i)$ is the canonical basis of $\mathbf{Z}^n$, it is called multi-grading. For instance, $[e_3,[e_1,e_3]]$ has multi-degree $(1,0,2,0,\dots,0)$.

Let $I$ be a finite-codimensional multi-graded ideal contained in $[\mathfrak{f}_n,\mathfrak{f}_n]$: so the quotient $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{f}_n/I$ is naturally multi-graded. There is a natural action of ${K^*}^n$ on $\mathfrak{g}$: namely $(t_1,\dots,t_n)$ acts on $\mathfrak{g}_{(m_1,\dots,m_n)}$ by multiplication by $\prod_{i=1}^n t_i^{m_i}$. Let $D\subset\mathrm{Aut}(\mathfrak{g})$ be the image of this action. Also denote by $c$ the nilpotency class of $\mathfrak{g}$: we assume $p>c$.

Using that $p>c$, we endow, à la Malcev–Lazard, $\mathfrak{g}$ with the group law given by the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula: $xy=x+y+\frac12[x,y]+\dots$. We thus view $\mathfrak{g}$ as both a Lie algebra and a group; we denote it as $G$ when endowed with the group law (but feel free to refer to the Lie algebra law in $G$); this is a $p$-group of exponent $p$ and nilpotency class $c<p$. Define $H=D\ltimes G$.

Every permutation $\sigma\in\mathfrak{S}_n$ induces an automorphism $u_\sigma$ of $\mathfrak{f}_n$, defined by $u_\sigma(e_i)=e_{\sigma(i)}$. Write $\Gamma_I=\Gamma_{\mathfrak{g}}=\{\sigma\in\mathfrak{S}_n:u_\sigma(I)=I\}$.

Proposition 1. The natural map $\Gamma_\mathfrak{g}\to\mathrm{Out}(H)$ is an isomorphism.

We need a lemma:

Lemma 2. Define $M$ as $\mathbf{F}_p^*\ltimes\mathbf{F}_p$. Then $\mathrm{Out(M^n})$ is reduced to the symmetric group permuting the $n$ factors.

Proof. Let $f$ be an automorphism. This is a product of $n$ directly indecomposable center-free abelian groups, hence its automorphism group permutes the $n$ (isomorphic) factors. Hence after composing with a permutation, we can suppose that $f$ preserves each factor. We are then reduced to checking that every automorphism of $\mathbf{F}_p^*\ltimes\mathbf{F}_p$ is inner. Indeed after composing by an inner automorphism, we can suppose that it maps the Hall subgroup $\mathbf{F}_p^*$ into itself. Then after composing with an inner automorphism, we can also suppose it acts as identity on $\mathbf{F}_p$. It easily follows that this is the identity. (Note for conciseness I used some slightly fancy results in this proof, but this lemma can be checked more elementarily.) $\Box$

Proof of the proposition. After composing with an inner automorphism, we can suppose that $f$ maps the Hall subgroup $D$ into itself.

Next, $f$ induces an automorphism of $H/[G,G]$, which can naturally be identified with $M^n$ of the previous lemma (recall that $I\subset [G,G]=[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}])$. Hence after composing with conjugation by some element of $D$, we can suppose that $f$ both preserves $D$ and acts on $H/[G,G]\simeq M^n$ by permuting the factors (without changing coordinates). Hence $f$ acts as the identity on $D$, and $f(e_i)=e_{\sigma(i)}+w_i$ for all $i$, with $w_i\in [G,G]$ ($+$ is the Lie algebra addition). Now, for $d\in D$, we have $f(d)=d$, so $f(de_id^{-1})=df(e_i)d^{-1}$. Choose $d$ as the action of $(t,\dots,t)$. Then this gives $t(e_{\sigma(i)}+w_i)=te_{\sigma(t)}+df(w_i)d^{-1}$. Hence $w_i$ is an eigenvector for the eigenvalue $t$ in $[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$, on which $d$ has the eigenvalues $(t^2,t^3,\dots,t^c)$. Choosing $t$ of order $p-1$, we see that $t$ is not an eigenvalue, and hence $w_i=0$. Hence up to inner automorphisms, every automorphism of $H$ is induced by permutation of the $n$ coordinates. Necessarily such a permutation has to be in $\Gamma_\mathfrak{g}$. $\Box$.

To conclude we have to prove:

Proposition 3. For every finite group $Q$ of order $n$ and prime $p>n+1$ there exist $n,p$ and $I$ finite-codimensional multi-graded ideal in $\mathfrak{f}_n(=\mathfrak{f}_n(\mathbf{F}_p)$, such that $\Gamma_I\simeq Q$. (And such that $\mathfrak{f}_n/I$ has nilpotency class $\le n+1$.)

This starts with the following, which provides for each finite group $Q$ a relation whose automorphism group is the group $L_Q\subset\mathfrak{S}(Q)$ of left translations of $Q$.

Lemma 4. Let $Q$ be a group, $n=|Q|$, and $q=(q_1,\dots,q_n)$ an injective $n$-tuple of $Q$. Define $X=Qq\subset Q^n$. Then $L_Q=\{\sigma\in\mathfrak{S}(Q):\sigma X=X\}$.

Proof. Clearly $L_Q$ preserves $X$. Conversely, if $\sigma$ preserves $X$, after composing with a left translation we can suppose that $\sigma(q_1)=q_1$, so $\sigma(q)\in\{q_1\}\times Q^{n-1}$; since $X\cap \{q_1\}\times Q^{n-1}=\{q\}$, we deduce $\sigma(q)=q$, which in turn implies $\sigma=\mathrm{Id}$. $\Box$.

Proof of the proposition. Write $\mathfrak{f}_Q\simeq\mathfrak{f}_n$ as the free Lie algebra over the generating family $(e_q)_{q\in Q}$. It can be viewed as graded in $\mathbf{Z}^G$, with basis $(E_q)_{q\in Q}$. Write $E=\sum_q E_q$.

For $q\in Q^n$, define $\xi_q=[e_{q_n},e_{q_1},e_{q_2},\dots,e_{q_n}]$ (note that it is homogeneous of degree $E+E_{q_n}$; in particular $(\xi_h)_{h\in X}$ is linearly independent. Fix an injective $n$-tuple $q$ and define $X$ as in the proof of the lemma; for convenience suppose $q_n=1$. Define $J$ as the $n$-dimensional subspace of $\mathfrak{f}_Q$ with basis $(\xi_h)_{h\in X}$.

Define $I=J\oplus \mathfrak{f}_Q^{n+2}$, where $\mathfrak{f}_Q^i$ is the $i$-th term in the lower central series. Hence $I$ is an ideal, and $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{f}_Q/I$ is defined by killing all $i$-fold commutators for $i\ge n+1$ and certain particular $(n+1)$-fold commutators. (Since we assume $p>n+1$, we can view it as a group as previously.)

Claim. For $h=(h_1,\dots,h_n)\in Q^n$ with $h_{n-1}\neq h_n$, we have $\xi_h\in I$ if and only if $h\in X$.

By definition, $h\in X$ implies the condition. Now suppose that $h$ satisfies the condition. First, the condition $h_{n-1}\neq h_n$ ensures that $\xi_h\neq 0$; it is homogeneous in the multi-grading. If it belongs to $J$, its multi-degree is therefore some permute of $(2,1,\dots,1)$. This is the case if and only if the $h_i$ are pairwise distinct, so we now assume it; its degree is therefore equal to $E_{h_n}+E$. Now $J_{E+E_{h_n}}$ is 1-dimensional, and generated by $\xi_{h_nq}$. Hence $\xi_h$ is a scalar multiple of $\xi_{h_nq}$: $$[e_{h_n},e_{h_1},\dots,e_{h_{n-1}},e_{h_n}]=\lambda [e_{h_n},e_{h_nq_1},\dots,e_{h_nq_{n-1}},e_{h_n}].$$ The next lemma implies that $h_i=h_nq_i$ for all $i\in\{1,\dots,n-1\}$. So $h\in X$. The claim is proved.

The claim implies that for every permutation $\sigma$ of $Q$, if the automorphism $u_\sigma$ of $\mathfrak{f}_Q$ preserves $I$, then $\sigma$ has to preserve $X$, and hence (Lemma 4) $\sigma$ is a left translation of $Q$. This finishes the proof. $\Box$.

Lemma 5 Consider the free Lie algebra on $(e_1,\dots,e_n)$. If for some permutation $\sigma$ of $\{1,\dots,n-1\}$ and scalar $\lambda$ we have $$[e_n,e_1,\dots,e_{n-1},e_n]=\lambda [e_n,e_{\sigma(1)},\dots,e_{\sigma(n-1)},e_n],$$ then $\sigma$ is the identity and $\lambda=1$.

Proof. Use the representation $f$ in $\mathfrak{gl}_n$ mapping $e_i$ to the elementary matrix $\mathcal{E}_{i-1,i}$ (consider indices modulo $n$). Then $[e_n,e_1,\dots,e_{n-1},e_n]=[e_n,e_1,[e_2,\dots,e_n]]$ maps to $$[\mathcal{E}_{n-1,n},\mathcal{E}_{n,1},\mathcal{E}_{1,n}]=[\mathcal{E}_{n-1,n},\mathcal{E}_{n,n}-,\mathcal{E}_{1,1}]=\mathcal{E}_{n-1,n}.$$ Let by contradiction $j$ be maximal such that $\sigma(j)\neq j$; note that $2\le j\le n-1$ and $n\ge 3$. Then $[e_n,e_{\sigma(1)},\dots,e_{\sigma(n-1)},e_n]=[e_n,e_{\sigma(1)},\dots,e_{\sigma(j)},[e_{j+1},\dots,e_n]]$ maps to $$w=[\mathcal{E}_{n,n-1},\mathcal{E}_{\sigma(1)-1,\sigma(1)},\dots,\mathcal{E}_{\sigma(j)-1,\sigma(j)},\mathcal{E}_{j,n}],$$ which cannot be zero. Hence $[\mathcal{E}_{\sigma(j)-1,\sigma(j)},\mathcal{E}_{j,n}]\neq 0$. Since $\sigma(j)<j$, this implies $\sigma(j)-1=n$ (modulo $n$), that is, $\sigma(j)=1$. So $$w=-[\mathcal{E}_{n,n-1},\mathcal{E}_{\sigma(1)-1,\sigma(1)},\dots,\mathcal{E}_{\sigma(j-1)-1,\sigma(j-1)},\mathcal{E}_{j,1}].$$ In turn, $[\mathcal{E}_{\sigma(j-1)-1,\sigma(j-1)},\mathcal{E}_{j,1}]$, using that $\sigma(j-1)\neq 1$, implies $\sigma(j-1)=j$, and so on, we deduce that $\sigma$ is the cycle $j\mapsto j+1$ (modulo $n-1$). Eventually we obtain $$w=[\mathcal{E}_{n-1,1},\mathcal{E}_{1,2},\mathcal{E}_{2,1}]=\mathcal{E}_{n-1,1}.$$ So $\mathcal{E}_{n-1,n}=\lambda \mathcal{E}_{n-1,1}$, contradiction.

(Note on Lemma 5: one has $[e_1,e_2,e_1,e_2]=[e_2,e_1,e_1,e_2]$, but this and its obvious consequences are probably the only identities between Lie monomials in the free Lie algebra, beyond the ones obtained from skew-symmetry in the last two variables.)

Note on the result: the resulting group $H$ roughly has size $|Q|^{|Q|}$, which is probably not optimal.

In Proposition 4, $I$ is strictly contained in $\mathfrak{f}_Q^{n+1}$, as soon as $|Q|\ge 3$, so the nilpotency class of $G$ is then equal to $n+1$. (For $|Q|=1$, choosing $p\ge 3$ outputs $H$ as the group $M=M_p$ which has trivial Out, and $G$ is abelian then; for $|Q|=2$, this outputs a group $H$ of order $(p-1)^2.p^3$ for chosen prime $p\ge 5$, and $G$ has nilpotency length $2$. For $|Q|=3$ it outputs a group $H$ of order $(p-1)^3.p^{29}$ for $p\ge 5$ which is already quite big.) To improve the bounds in explicit cases by running this method, one should describe $Q$ a permutation group of a set $Y$ that can be described as stabilizer of some $\ell$-ary relation $R$ contained in the set of pairwise distinct $\ell$-tuples of $Y$, for $\ell$ as small as possible.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Have you turned this into a paper? (it's worth it) $\endgroup$ Oct 9, 2021 at 11:48

In [Bryant, R. M.; Kovács, L. G., Lie representations and groups of prime power order. J. London Math. Soc. (2) 17 (1978), no. 415-421], the authors come close to proving what you ask: they show that any group $G < GL(V)$, with $V$ an elementary abelian $p$-group, can be realized as the image of $Aut(P) \rightarrow Aut(P/\Phi(P)) = GL(V)$, for some finite $p$--group $P$ with Frattini quotient $P/\Phi(P) = V$.

I used this in a paper with Frank Adams in the late 1980's, and we also reference Theorem 13.5 of Huppert and Blackburn, Finite Groups II. Section 13 of that book is all about automorphisms of $p$--groups. My memory (30 years old) is that exactly the result you are interested in was proved there. (This is not available online, so I can't easily check this right now.)

Added a little bit later: I should perhaps have explicitly pointed out that the map $Aut(P) \rightarrow Aut(P/\Phi(P))$ factors through $Aut(P) \rightarrow Out(P)$. Also the kernel of this map is a $p$--group: see e.g. [ (24.1), Aschbacher, Finite Group Theory ]. So one knows that, for any prime $p$, any finite group is the quotient of $Out(P)$ for some finite $p$--group $P$, with another $p$--group as kernel.

  • $\begingroup$ A quote from the remark at the end of §13 of the above reference: "Theorem 13.5 shows that any subgroup of $GL(n, p)$ is the linear group induced on $\mathfrak{P}/ \Phi(\mathfrak{P})$ by Aut$(\mathfrak{P})$ for some $p$-group $\mathfrak{P}$. Since any finite group is isomorphic to a subgroup of $GL(n, p)$ for some $n$, every finite group is isomorphic to the group induced on $\mathfrak{P} / \Phi(\mathfrak{P})$ by Aut$(\mathfrak{P})$ for some $p$-group $\mathfrak{P}$." $\endgroup$ Sep 24, 2020 at 13:50
  • $\begingroup$ (The book is available online, albeit from canonical non-MO-linkable places). $\endgroup$ Sep 24, 2020 at 13:52
  • $\begingroup$ @Carl-FredrikNybergBrodda Thanks for looking this up. So I guess they basically say the same as Bryant and Kovacs. $\endgroup$ Sep 24, 2020 at 15:02
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Also the induced map $\mathrm{Out}(P)\to\mathrm{Aut}(P/\Phi P)$ has its kernel a $p$-group. Hence this shows that for every finite group $G$ and prime $p$ there exists a finite $p$-group $H$ and a surjective map $\mathrm{Out}(H)\to G$ whose kernel is a $p$-group. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Sep 24, 2020 at 15:07
  • $\begingroup$ @YCor Thanks for pointing out this classic fact. I've added this into my answer. $\endgroup$ Sep 24, 2020 at 15:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.