This is a follow-up on this (answered) question on math.SE, but involves a different topology. I think this time it is more appropriate for MO. I will repeat the background from the question cited above.

Denote by $Lip_0(X)$ the set of all Lipschitz functions on a metric space $X$ vanishing at some base point $e \in X$. The norm in $Lip_0$ is defined as follows $$ \|f\|_{Lip_0} := Lip(f), $$ where $Lip(f)$ denotes the Lipschitz constant. With pointwise operations $f \vee g := \max\{f,g\}$ and $f \wedge g := \min\{f,g\}$ the space $Lip_0$ becomes a Lipschitz lattice, in which the following condition holds $$ \|f \vee g\|_{Lip_0} \leq \max\{\|f\|_{Lip_0},\|g\|_{Lip_0}\}. $$ The Banach lattice condition $|f| \leq |g| \implies \|f\| \leq \|g\|$, however, fails. (Nik Weaver. Lipschitz Algebras, 2nd ed.)

For a large class of metric spaces $X$, the space $Lip_0(X)$ has a unique predual, which is called the Arens-Eels space or the Lipschitz-free space, depending on the community. It can be seen as the completion of the space of Radon measures with zero mean $\mathcal M_0(X)$ with respect to the dual Lipschitz norm $$ \|\mu\|_{Lip*} := \sup\{\langle \mu,f \rangle \colon \|f\|_{Lip_0} \leq 1\}. $$ What is added by this completion are limits as $d(x,y) \to 0$ of linear combinations of the so-called elementary molecules $$ m_{xy} := \frac{1}{d(x,y)}(\delta_x - \delta_y), $$ where $d(x,y)$ is the distance between $x,y \in X$ and $\delta_x, \delta_y$ are delta-functions placed at $x,y$. (Nik Weaver. Lipschitz Algebras, 2nd ed.)

As pointed out in the answer to the question I cited above, lattice operations $f_+ := f \vee 0$, $f_- := (-f) \vee 0$ and $|f| := f \vee (-f)$ are not continuous in the $Lip_0$ norm, i.e. $$ \|f_n - f\|_{Lip_0} \to 0 \quad \text{does not imply} \quad \|(f_n)_+ - f_+\|_{Lip_0} \to 0. $$

Question. Are operations $f_+ := f \vee 0$, $f_- := (-f) \vee 0$ and $|f| := f \vee (-f)$ sequentially continuous in the weak* topology, i.e. does $$ f_n \rightharpoonup^* f \implies (f_n)_+ \rightharpoonup^* f_+ $$ hold?

Any help will be much appreciated.


Yes. If $f_n \to f$ weak* then the sequence $(f_n)$ must be bounded in ${\rm Lip}_0(X)$ (Banach-Steinhaus), and for bounded nets weak* convergence is the same as pointwise convergence. So $f_n \to f$ boundedly pointwise, which easily implies the same of the positive parts.

Let me also correct a couple of inaccuracies in your post: first, we do know that ${\rm Lip}_0(X)$ has a unique predual for a large class of spaces $X$ (if it has finite diameter, or if it is convex), but this is not known for all $X$. Second, what is added in the completion is limits of linear combinations of elementary molecules.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much for your prompt reply! And thank you for pointing out the inaccuracies, I have edited the post now. $\endgroup$ – Yury Sep 15 '20 at 9:09
  • $\begingroup$ You are welcome! $\endgroup$ – Nik Weaver Sep 15 '20 at 13:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.