One up-vote, 35 views, and no comments and no answers have resulted from this reference request that I posted on math.stackexchange.com . This was actually inspired by a probability exercise, and at this point I'm half-way expecting someone to figure out how that happened before anyone finds the answer. But we'll see.
(Note that there are two links to m.s.e. in this present question. The one that appears above is a link to the reference request; the one below is to an earlier posting.)
In this question I conjectured that a simple proposition about ellipses holds. In the accepted answer, "Chrystomath" proves it.
Is this in some published refereed source?
quote:
Consider a closed bounded set with non-empty interior in the plane. Suppose it is strictly convex, i.e. every point between two of its points is one of its interior points. This entails that a line that intersecting its boundary but not its interior intersects it at only one point. Call such a line a tangent line. It follows that for every tangent line, there is exactly one other tangent line parallel to it. Suppose that for every line parallel to those two and between them, the midpoint of the intersection of that line with our closed bounded convex set is on the line connecting the two points of tangency.
[i.e. for EVERY such pair of tangent lines]
Does it follow that our closed bounded set is the convex hull of an ellipse?