Let $R$ be a discrete valuation ring with fraction field $K$ and $C, D$ two nodal (=prestable) curves over $\operatorname{Spec} R$. If I have a map $C_K \to D_K$ between the restriction of the curves to the generic point $\operatorname{Spec} K$,

  1. can I blow up $C$ to extend this to a map $C \to D$ over $\operatorname{Spec} R$?

  2. If I blow up $C$ to do this, can I ensure that the result remains a nodal curve and the generic fiber $C_K$ is unchanged?

If it helps, the map $C_K \to D_K$ is a "partial stabilization" -- it contracts $\mathbb{P}^1$'s.

Remark: This is pretty clear for smooth curves, and well documented in the stacks project.

(My plan of attack so far:

A) Stacks 0BX7 should let me extend the map away from a finite set of closed points in the special fiber of $C$.

B) I believe these closed points should be nodes that get smoothed out in the generic fiber -- if the node persists, then maybe I can define the map at the node via specialization of the two generic points without a problem.

C) If the node gets smoothed out, this is etale-locally pulled back from $\mathbb{A}^2 \to \mathbb{A}^1$ and one can see directly the blowup at this node remains nodal.

D) By taking the closure $\Gamma$ of the graph of the rational map $C \dashrightarrow D$, I can argue that the projection $\Gamma \to C$ is a blowup at nodes in the special fiber that get smoothed out, since the map can be extended already away from those points.

I don't completely believe any of these steps -- this is more of a sketch than a proof. I'd very much like citations and references to any argument, esp. to the stacks project. )

  • $\begingroup$ I should mention that I'm over the complex numbers and the map $C \to D$, if it exists, would also be a partial stabilization. $\endgroup$
    – Leo Herr
    Commented Jul 22, 2020 at 19:55

1 Answer 1


After lots of help from others, I realized the question boils down to some sort of stable reduction, which is a properness statement for the moduli of stable or relative stable maps $\overline{M}(X/V)$.

The isomorphism $C_K \simeq D_K$ provides a point $C_K \to C_K \times D_K$ over $K$ of $\overline{M}(C \times D/\operatorname{Spec} R)$. Properness (=stable reduction) extends this to a map $C' \to C \times D$ over $\operatorname{Spec}R$. The maps $C' \to C, C' \to D$ must be partial stabilizations because that's a closed condition in the base, and they're blowups because they're proper birational.

The blowups are at closed subschemes supported at a finite number of points in the special fiber, and I wish I could say the centers are smooth or something (or iterated blowups at smooth centers), but I don't need it.

Can anyone see why that would be, say by the fact that the exceptional divisors are chains of $\mathbb{P}^1$'s or something?

I apologize if this question and answer were obvious to the broader community.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.