3
$\begingroup$

For a fixed "reasonable" metric space $(X,d)$ (say complete, separable, whatever is needed...), a curve $\gamma:[0,1]\to X$ is said to be $AC^p(0,1)$ (absolutely continuous) if $$ d(\gamma(s),\gamma(t))\leq\int_s^t m(r)dr \qquad\mbox{for all }0\leq s\leq t\leq 1 $$ for some nonnegative function $m\in L^p(0,1)$ (with an obvious definition for $p=\infty$, corresponding to Lipschitz curves).

Theorem: If $\gamma\in AC^p(0,1)$ for some $p\in [1,\infty]$ then the metric derivative $$ |\dot\gamma(t)|:=\lim\limits_{h\to 0}\frac{d(\gamma(t+h),\gamma(t))}{h} $$ exists for a.a. $t\in (0,1)$, it is an $L^p$ function, and it is the smallest admissible function $m$ in the above definition of $AC^p$ curves.

The statement and proof can be found in [Ambrosio, Gigli, Savaré, Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures, thm. 1.1.2 page 24]

I am interested in the following characterization of $AC^p$ curves.


Question: Assume that I have a curve $\gamma:[0,1]\to X$ such that, for some function $m\in L^p(0,1)$, there holds $$ |\dot\gamma(t)|_+:=\limsup\limits_{h\to 0}\frac{d(\gamma(t+h),\gamma(t))}{h}\leq m(t) \qquad \mbox{for a.a. }t\in (0,1). $$ Can I conclude that $\gamma\in AC^p$ with $|\dot\gamma(t)|=|\dot\gamma(t)|_+\leq m(t)$ for a.e. $t$?

Of course this seems very plausible, but so far I cannot prove it by hand and I could not find this statement anywhere in the literature. Is this known? (I suspect that there should be an elementary proof) Can anyone provide a reference?


Quick comment: of course the function $|\dot\gamma(t)|_+$ is some kind of upper metric derivative which presumably should control the metric speed itself, it is exists. The statement would immediately follow if we could prove directly that $$ d(\gamma(s),\gamma(t))\leq \int _s^t |\dot\gamma(\tau)|_+d\tau, $$ but so far I am stuck and I don't really see how to proceed from the definition of $|\dot\gamma|_+$.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ This is wrong even for real-valued curves. The standard example is the devil's staircase (or modifications thereof), which satisfies $\dot \gamma=0$ a.e., yet $\gamma(0)=0$, $\gamma(1)=1$. $\endgroup$ – MaoWao Jul 2 '20 at 15:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ahahah, so true! I didn't even realise that the general metric setting covers of course the good old classics. God, sometimes I wish I started thinking about the real line, before even talking about metric spaces. Thank you MaoWao. Care to make this an answer so I can mark it as accepted? Perhaps other people would need this too. $\endgroup$ – leo monsaingeon Jul 2 '20 at 15:54
2
$\begingroup$

This is not even true for real-valued functions. The standard counterexample is the Cantor function, which is differentiable a.e. with derivative $0$, but is not constant as any absolutely continuous function with this property would be.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.