1
$\begingroup$

In 'Fundamental Algebraic Geometry' by Fantechi there is a lemma in section 5.3.2, page 119:

LEMMA 5.5 Let $S$ be a noetherian scheme and let $F$ be a coherent sheaf on $\mathbb{P}^n_S$. Suppose there exist some integer $N$ such that for all $r \ge N$ the direct image $\pi_*F(r)= \pi_*(F \otimes O_{\mathbb{P}^n_S}(r))$ is locally free. ($\pi$ is the structure morphism $\mathbb{P}^n_S \to S$). Claim: Then $F$ is flat over $S$.

Now the author leaves as exercise to show that the converse(!) of the above lemma holds as well: if $F$ is flat over $S$ then $\pi_*F(r)$ is locally free for all sufficiently large $r$.

Does anybody know how the proof of the converse works or where I can find it?

About the choice of suitable $N$ I conjecture that Serre's vanishing theorem may play an important role in the proof:

Let $A$ a ring and $F$ coherent on $\mathbb{P}^n_A$. Then for all $i \ge 1$ there exist $m_0$ with $H^i(\mathbb{P}^n_A, F(m))$ for all $m \ge m_0$.

But that's just my suspucion, not more since I otherwise not know how a candidate for $N$ can be found.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ See for example Hartshorne, Theorem III.9.9. The idea is to use a Čech resolution and Serre vanishing. $\endgroup$ – R. van Dobben de Bruyn yesterday
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @R.vanDobbendeBruyn: You mean that one which starts with "Let $T$ be an integral noetherian scheme. Let $X \subset \mathbb{P}^n_T$ be a closed subscheme... And the claim is that $X$ is flat over $T$ iff Hilbert polynomial $P_t$ is independent of $t$. Here is required that $T$ is integral, especially reduced, the book seems to work without it but thats subtile. $\endgroup$ – Ghost in Grothendieck universe yesterday
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This can be deduced from semicontinuity theorem . For sufficiently large $N$, higher direct images of $F(N)$ vanish. Then the direct image is locally free. $\endgroup$ – Mohan yesterday
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You're right, the reference doesn't cover the precise statement, but as @Mohan points out Thm III.12.11 does (together with Thm III.8.8). $\endgroup$ – R. van Dobben de Bruyn yesterday
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I also think the (very short) proof of Thm III.9.9 (i)$\Rightarrow$(ii) applies verbatim in this context, because that direction uses neither that $\mathscr F$ is the structure sheaf nor that $T$ is integral. In fact the first is not even stated as an assumption, and the second is only used for (iii)$\Rightarrow$(ii). $\endgroup$ – R. van Dobben de Bruyn yesterday

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.