4
$\begingroup$

For a prime number $p$ and the Brown-Peterson spectrum $BP$, let $T:BP\to H\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ be the Thom map, and $T':BP\to H\mathbb{Z}_p$ be the mop $p$ reduction of $T$. Tamanoi (1) determined the image of $$T'_*:BP^*(K(\mathbb{Z}_{(p)},n+2))\to H\mathbb{Z}_p^*(K(\mathbb{Z}_{(p)},n+2))$$ for $n\geq 1$. My question is, whether the same has been considered, or follows easily from the above, for $$T_*:BP^*(K(\mathbb{Z}_{(p)},n+2))\to H\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}^*(K(\mathbb{Z}_{(p)},n+2)).$$ In particular, I would like to know if there is any nontrivial class of dimension $n+2$ in the image.

Some computation seems to suggest that for n=1, we have $p\iota_{n+2}\in \operatorname{Im}T_*$ where $\iota_{n+2}\in H\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}^*(K(\mathbb{Z}_{(p)},n+2))$ is the fundamental class, but of course I could be missing something.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Ravenel-Wilson-Yagita proved (maybe it is already in Tamanoi) that the $BP$ cohomology of Eilenberg-Maclane spaces is generated by the elements that get detected in mod $p$ cohomology. So $p\iota _{n+2}$ isn't in the image unless $\iota _{(n+2)}$ is, which only happens for $n=0$. $\endgroup$
    – user43326
    Jun 29, 2020 at 13:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I guess the above arguments can be extended to determine the image of $T_*$. $\endgroup$
    – user43326
    Jun 29, 2020 at 14:01

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Here is an "answer" which may be or not be good enough for your purpose, but which is easy to prove.

Let's start with Ravenel-Wilson-Yagita Theorem 1.20. Applied to Eilenberg-Maclane spaces, it implies that their $BP$ cohomology is generated by the elements detected by mod $p$ cohomology, in fact the elements maps to the set of elements described by Tamanoi.

The information above suffices to conclude that as a graded abelian groups, the image of $BP^*(K(Z_{(p)},n)\to H^*(K(Z_{(p)},n),Z_{(p)})$ is generated by some lift of Tamanoi's generator. In particular we can already conclude that $p\iota _{n+2}$ is not in the image if $n>0$.

I am not completely sure but probably these elements are torsion-free, which should give the additive structure of the image. If not, just study the the Bockstein spectral sequence.

If you need to determine concretely which elements of $H^*(K(Z_{(p)},n),Z_{(p)})$ are actually in the image, basically you will need to follow what Tamanoi did (fortunately not all). Step 1) find a description of what he calls $BP$-fundamental class in $H^*(K(Z_{(p)},n),Z_{(p)})$. Step 2) Find out which cohomology operations in $HZ_{(p)}^*HZ_{(p)}$ are covered by Landweber-Novikov operations. Step 3) find what the operations in the step 2 do to the element in the step 1.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer! I still need some time to entirely convince myself of your argument though. $\endgroup$
    – Xing Gu
    Jun 30, 2020 at 16:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.