1
$\begingroup$

Suppose there's a projective $R$-module $P$ (non-free). We know that there is another $R$-module $M$ such that $P\oplus M$ is free over $R$. Is there a way to write down such an $M$ in terms of $P$?

If this is not always tractable, is it possible in certain specialized circumstances? The setting that comes to mind is where $P$ is a non-principal ideal of the ring of integers of a number field (as Wikipedia says this is an instance of $P$ being projective but not free).

Thanks!

(This was originally posted on math.stackexchange but I realized that here might be the better place to ask, apologies if not.)

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I can imagine it's one of those "I'll know it when I see it", but do you have a rigorous definition of "in terms of $P$"? For example, one can take $M$ to be the kernel of the projection to the module $P$ from the free $R$-module on the set $P$. Does that count? $\endgroup$ – LSpice Jun 20 '20 at 23:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, I'd say that this solution falls into "in terms of $P$", thanks! To really get a sense of what direct-summing $M$ does, I was also hoping to be able to think about what the module $P\oplus M$ "looks like", separately from the exact sequence context (since that seems to be the most natural way to actually prove the freeness of $P\oplus M$) --- is there a nice way to think about the isomorphism between $P\oplus M$ and the free module $FP$ on $P$? I'm having trouble picturing exactly what that might be, i.e. how to carry $p\oplus\sum r_ip_i$ to a $FP$-element. $\endgroup$ – zjs Jun 21 '20 at 2:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The problem with a question like "how to carry $p \oplus m$ to an element of $F P$" is that, in the generality of a totally arbitrary (ring $R$ and) projective $P$, we just have no way of peeking into the structure of $P$ other than by using the universal property; and, in terms of the universal property, the answer is that we use a splitting $P \to F P$ of $M \hookrightarrow F P \twoheadrightarrow P$ to map $P \oplus M \to F P$, and I think that's all that can be said! Obviously @StevenLandsburg's answer is more interesting. $\endgroup$ – LSpice Jun 21 '20 at 3:17
3
$\begingroup$

If you want something completely general, LSpice's comment is the answer.

For the special case of an ideal $P$ in the ring $R$ of integers of a number field (or more generally if $R$ is a Dedekind domain) you can take $M=\{x\in K|xI\subset R\}$, where $K$ is the fraction field of $R$. The keyword to Google is fractional ideal.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! Do you have advice on how to show that that $M$ suffices? e.g. in $K=\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{-5}]$ where $\frak{a}=\langle 2,1+\sqrt{-5}\rangle$ gives a nontrivial element of the class group $Cl(\mathcal{O}_K)\cong\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$, I'm having some trouble seeing the way to view $\frak{a}\oplus\frak{a}$ as free (either as a $\mathcal{O}_K$-module or $\mathbb{Z}$-module), and more generally how to see direct-summing of ideals as being equivalent in some way to their product. $\endgroup$ – zjs Jun 21 '20 at 2:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In a Dedekind ring $R$ the direct sum of two ideals is related to their product by the formula $P\oplus Q\approx PQ\oplus R$. This is quite standard material, and any commutative algebra textbook should give you all the details. $\endgroup$ – Steven Landsburg Jun 21 '20 at 2:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.