Let us consider the Riemann zeta function $\zeta(s)$, where $s$ can take on values on the domain $\mathbb{R}_{>1}$:

$$\zeta(s) := \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^{s}} .$$

I wonder what is known about the functional square root(s) of the Riemann zeta function defined on the aforementioned domain (*). In other words, I'm curious about the properties of the function(s) $f$ such that $$f(f(s)) = \zeta(s). \qquad \qquad (1)$$


  1. Has a closed-form solution been found for $f$ in equation $(1)$ ?
  2. If not (which I expect), have partial results been found for such a function? Properties like existence, (non)uniqueness, continuity, or results about the functional square root of the partial sums? $$f(f(s)) = \sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{1}{n^{s}} \qquad \qquad k \in \mathbb{Z}_{>0}$$
  3. If so, I would be grateful if you have some pointers to relevant articles or other sources.

(Cross-post from MSE.)

(*) Edit as per Gerald Edgar's answer, this condition should be changed. We must define $f$ on $(0, \infty) \cup X$ for some subset $X \subset \mathbb{R} \setminus (0,\infty) $. Then $f$ must map $(1,\infty)$ bijectively onto $X$, and $X$ iself onto $(0,\infty)$. Under these conditions, there is still a possibility that $f$ is both continuous and real-valued. I am interested in the properties of such an $f$.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Are you sure this is the question you want to ask? The zeta function on the domain you consider takes values outside this domain, so it cannot have a functional square root. In fact, for z with real part greater than 1, $\zeta(z)$ may have negative real part. See e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/1112.4910.pdf. $\endgroup$ – Dmitry Vaintrob May 1 '20 at 23:37
  • $\begingroup$ Well, it turns out that one needs to deal with fixpoints. I no longer have all the references on a website, but take a look at mathoverflow.net/questions/45608/… and my self-answers. I can see that there is a fixpoint in the reals between 1 and, say, 10. $\endgroup$ – Will Jagy May 2 '20 at 3:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DmitryVaintrob I should also include that I'm only considering real $s>1$, so the values $\zeta(s)$ take are positive and real too $\endgroup$ – Max Muller May 2 '20 at 8:17
  • $\begingroup$ For real $s > 1$, $\zeta(s)$ maps $(1,\infty)$ bijectively onto itself. It is continuous and decreasing. A functional square root can therefore not be real-valued and continuous. $\endgroup$ – Gerald Edgar May 2 '20 at 11:27
  • $\begingroup$ @GeraldEdgar Could you please elaborate on that? I don't see why such a root can't be real-valued and continuous at once $\endgroup$ – Max Muller May 2 '20 at 22:00

Note that $\zeta$ maps $(1,\infty)$ bijectively onto itself, $\zeta$ is continuous, $\zeta$ is decreasing on $(1,\infty)$.

Suppose $\zeta = f \circ f$ where $f$ also maps $(1,\infty)$ onto itself. A continuous injective function $f$ from an interval to an interval is either increasing everywhere or decreasing everywhere. (This is from the intermediate value theorem.) But in either case, $f\circ f$ is increasing, so $f \circ f \ne \zeta$.

Now of course we can define $f$ on some larger set, say $(1,\infty) \cup X$, where $X$ has the power of the continuum. Let $f$ map $(1,\infty)$ bijectively onto $X$ and $X$ bijectively onto $(1,\infty)$. Easy.

  • $\begingroup$ Ahh, I see. Thank you! I'll modify the question according to the answer you've given, because I'm still curious about the existence of such an $f$ defined on a larger set. $\endgroup$ – Max Muller May 3 '20 at 16:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.