5
$\begingroup$

Let $\mu\lll\nu$ be $\sigma$-finite Borel measures, which are not finite, on a topological space $X$. Under what conditions is $0<\operatorname{ess-supp}(\frac{d\mu}{d\nu}I_K)<\infty$ for every compact subset $\emptyset\subset K\subseteq X$.

In other words when is $\frac{d\mu}{d\nu} \in L^{\infty}_{\nu,\mathrm{loc}}(X)$?

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ My google ninja's skill got me the following: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3119941/… is this helpful? $\endgroup$
    – Alan
    Commented Apr 30, 2020 at 18:26
  • $\begingroup$ @Alan It is pretty interesting, but I don't want to assume any such geometric structure. Btw, I like the ninja skills terminology I'll have to borrow it :) $\endgroup$
    – ABIM
    Commented Apr 30, 2020 at 18:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I got this terminology from someone else in physicsforums, can't remember from whom though. :-D $\endgroup$
    – Alan
    Commented Apr 30, 2020 at 18:33
  • $\begingroup$ What type of conditions do you need? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 30, 2020 at 19:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ in fact $\| \frac{d\mu}{d\nu}\|_{\infty,K}=\sup_{H\subset K} \frac{\mu(H)}{\nu(H)}$ $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 30, 2020 at 19:33

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Let $$f:=\frac{d\mu}{d\nu}.$$ Then $$f\in L^{\infty}_{\nu,loc}(X)\iff\text{$\forall$ compact $K\subseteq X$ $\exists$ $c_K\in(0,\infty)$ $\forall$ Borel $A$ we have $\mu(A\cap K)\le c_K\nu(A\cap K)$.}$$

Indeed, for the $\Rightarrow$ implication, take any compact $K\subseteq X$. Then $\exists$ $c_K\in(0,\infty)$ such that $f\le c_K$ $\nu$-a.e. on $K$. So, for any Borel $A$ we have $$\mu(A\cap K)=\int_{A\cap K}f\,d\nu\le c_K\nu(A\cap K),$$ as desired.

Vice versa, for the $\Leftarrow$ implication, take any compact $K\subseteq X$ and suppose that $\mu(A\cap K)\le c_K\nu(A\cap K)$ for some $c_K\in(0,\infty)$ and all Borel $A$. Let now $A:=f^{-1}((c_K,\infty))$, so that $f>c_K$ on $A$. Then $$\mu(A\cap K)=\int_{A\cap K}f\,d\nu\ge c_K\nu(A\cap K),$$ and the latter inequality is strict (and hence contradicts condition $\mu(A\cap K)\le c_K\nu(A\cap K)$) if $\nu(A\cap K)>0$. So, $\nu(A\cap K)=0$, that is, $f\le c_K$ $\nu$-a.e. on $K$, as desired.


Similarly, for any compact $K\subseteq X$, $$\operatorname{esssup}_Kf>0\iff \text{ $\exists$ $b_K\in(0,\infty)$ $\exists$ Borel $A$ such that $\mu(A\cap K)\ge b_K\nu(A\cap K)$.}$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ As a general question of interest, is this relation used/ does it have a name or is it a bit arbitrary? $\endgroup$
    – ABIM
    Commented Apr 30, 2020 at 19:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AnnieTheKatsu : I don't know of a name for this relation. It should be folklore, rather transparent from a standard proof of the Radon--Nikodym theorem; cf. the comment by Pietro Majer. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 30, 2020 at 19:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .