2
$\begingroup$

An upper semi-continuous function $u : \Omega \to \mathbb{R}$, $\Omega \subseteq \mathbb{C}^n$ is said to be subharmonic if it satisfies the submean inequality $u(a) \leq \mu_S(u;a,r)$, where $\mu_S(u;a,r)$ is the mean value of $u$ on the sphere $S(a,r)$ with center $a$ and radius $r$ (for any $a$,$r$ such that the closed ball $\overline{B(a,r)}$ is contained in $\Omega$).

The function is said to be plurisubharmonic if it is subharmonic restricted to any complex line. It is straight-forward to see that plurisubharmonic implies subharmonic, see for example Demailly, "Complex Differential and Algebraic Geometry", §I.5.A. It is also not so difficult to see that plurisubharmonicity is invariant under holomorphic changes of coordinates, see for example Demailly, Theorem I.5.11.

The entry Encyclopedia of Mathematics: Pluripotential theory states that "Plurisubharmonic functions are precisely the subharmonic functions invariant under a holomorphic change of coordinates". One inclusion is clear from above, but does anyone have an idea of how to prove the other inclusion, i.e.: if $u$ is subharmonic with respect to any local holomorphic coordinates, then $u$ is plurisubharmonic?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

It is actually enough to assume that your function $u$ defined on a neighborhood of $0\in \mathbb C^n$ remains subharmonic after composing with any linear transformation.

Indeed, let $0\neq \lambda \in \mathbb C^n$ and set, for $\sigma \in \mathbb C^*$,

$$A(\sigma) = \begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 & \sigma a_{12} & \cdots & \sigma a_{1n}\\\ \vdots & \vdots & & \vdots \\\ \vdots & \vdots & &\vdots\\\ \lambda_n & \sigma a_{n2} & \cdots & \sigma a_{nn} \end{pmatrix}$$

with $a_{ij} $ chosen such that the matrix is invertible. Then one finds, at the origin

$$\begin{eqnarray} \Delta (u \circ A(\sigma))&=&\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{\partial^2(u \circ A(\sigma))}{\partial z_k \partial \bar{z_k}}(0)\\\ &=&\sum_{k=1}^n \sum_{1\leq i,j\leq n}A(\sigma)_{ik} \overline{A(\sigma)_{jk}} \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial z_i \partial \bar {z_j}}(0)\\\ &=&Hu_{0}(\lambda) + |\sigma|^2 \sum_{\ell=2}^n Hu_{0}((a_{j \ell})_{j}) \end{eqnarray}$$

where $H$ denotes the complex hessian. This quantity is non-negative by assumption, and one gets the result by making $\sigma$ approach $0$.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Are you assuming that the function is smooth? That argument can be modified to work with non-smooth functions. $\endgroup$ – Oleg Eroshkin Apr 14 '20 at 15:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, I was assuming that $u$ was $\mathcal C^2$. If $u$ is not $\mathcal C^2$, take a convolution $u_\varepsilon=u\ast \rho_{\varepsilon}$ of $u$ with a smoothing kernel $\rho_{\varepsilon}$. Then, $u_\varepsilon$ remains subharmonic after composing with any affine transformation and the argument above shows that $u_\varepsilon$ is psh, hence so is $u$. $\endgroup$ – Henri Apr 14 '20 at 15:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hi, nice computation but I guess you want the $\lambda$'s to be on the first column of $A$, not the first row. $\endgroup$ – user111 Apr 23 '20 at 13:20
  • $\begingroup$ @user111 You are perfectly right; I edited the answer accordingly. Thanks. $\endgroup$ – Henri Apr 23 '20 at 14:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.